My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-01-05 tginger
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-01-05 tginger
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 8:43:04 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 8:42:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATANABE: Yeah, I’ll defer to Mr. Galdones. <br />GRAHAM: Okay. <br />GALDONES: Thank you, Mr. Watanabe. Thank you, Mr. Chair. In the Ginger Patch <br />DP, LLC change of zone application (REZ 06-000052), I move that a favorable recommendation <br />of the Change of Zone request be forwarded to the County Council, along with the background <br />report and the recommendations as submitted. <br />WATANABE: Second. <br />GRAHAM: All right. We have a motion for a favorable recommendation and a <br />second. Do we have any comments or discussion by the Commissioners? <br />ALAMEDA: Mr. Chair? <br />GRAHAM: Commissioner Alameda. <br />ALAMEDA: Thank you, Mr. Chair. You know, I know that the Miyashiro’s and the <br />Shiroma’s are in support of this project and trust Mr. Gomes in his development. But how I look <br />at this project is this doesn’t only affect the Miyashiro’s and the Shiroma’s. This affects all of <br />Hilo, people who live above the project, to the side, to the other side. And that whole traffic <br />situation right here is already an issue without this project. And I’m just concerned, I mean my <br />primary concern is the whole traffic issue. So I just wanted to put it on the table. I’m not sure <br />yet where I’m leaning, but I have reservations on this project. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you. Commissioner Galdones? Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA: I share Commissioner Alameda’s concerns; and as a deliberative body I <br />think we should be deliberative about this and have the necessary information so that, you know, <br />a TIAR should be provided. And it should be done and provided to the Commissioners so that <br />we can have the information and decide whether or not in the big picture, you know, that these <br />traffic concerns would not be an overriding factor in terms of whether it should go forward or <br />not. So I’ll be voting against the motion. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you. Commissioner Galdones. <br />GALDONES: Thank you, Mr. Chair. The reason I’m supporting the conditions of <br />approval as submitted, especially in Conditions E, F and G, is because I’m no expert in traffic <br />studies and there is an agency that deals with that, and that is the Department of Transportation, <br />Highways Division. And the conditions of approval state that a TIAR has to be submitted to the <br />Department of Transportation for review. Now I’m not certain if there is a process in which the <br />public can give some kind of input to the Department of Transportation through the process <br />when they make a final approval of what the traffic should look like after the study is made. But <br />I would have to leave it up to that agency who has the expertise in dealing with these situations. <br /> EXHIBIT B 20 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.