My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-01-06 TGARDNER
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-01-06 TGARDNER
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 8:45:46 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 8:45:42 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
perhaps should be downgraded to a 45 mile-an-hour speed limit rather than 55 asyou approach <br />that intersection, just because, you know, people are going to be slowing down to make those <br />turns. And this property is within a quarter mile of that intersection; and I believe it would be <br />appropriate to have a reduced speed fronting that area. <br />SIRACUSA:Thank you. I agree with you on that. I also agree with you on the fact that <br />we do need industrial zoning. Im just not sure that this is the place to put it. However, I did <br />want to address the access. The Fire Department would be accessing from that parcel right onto <br />the highway. And I believe the Police Department as well when they put their, for the same <br />reasons? <br />NISHIMURA:Well -. <br />SIRACUSA:Would they be using the same access road? <br />NISHIMURA:Initially that is what was anticipated, that the Police Department would <br />havetheirownseparateaccesspoint.However,Icannotspeakforthematthistime;anditmay <br />be that with the development of the recreational facilities the whole access for the park as well as <br />the police substation may be combined or may be altered in some way. At this point I dont <br />believe the plans have progressed to the point where a definitive answer can be given. <br />SIRACUSA:Its my understanding that the police development would precede any <br />development from Parks and Recreation, which might possibly decide instead of going right to <br />the highway to ease up some of the traffic there by going from the back road. But Im still, you <br />know, I look at that, I drive that practically every day and its already a nightmare. If we have to <br />wait for State Department of Transportation to make improvements, then Im really concerned <br />because weve been waiting, since the bypass was built weve been waiting for more than six <br />years to get a stupid little school crossing sign on the road from DOT. And that doesnt give me <br />a great amount of faith. <br />ALAMEDA:Any other questions for our applicant? Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:I was asking him questions. <br />ALAMEDA:You have any additional? <br />SIRACUSA:Not right now. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Other Commissioners, any questions? Okay. Any other comments <br />before I ask you to sit down? <br />NISHIMURA:I guess I should address the letter that was submitted by the Nahooikaikas. <br />And, you know, one of their concerns was to have people coming to the property and being able <br />to see their property and, I guess, invade their privacy. It is the intent of the developer to <br />completely fence and landscape the perimeter boundaries of the property so that as best as they <br />can screen their use from the adjoining properties; and, again, this is a very low impact type of <br />use. There is not, its not a high volume or high traffic generator. People store their belongings <br />9EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.