My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
State Sunshine Law Update
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Kailua Village Design Commission
>
Applications & Materials
>
2020-2024
>
2022
>
01-11 Meeting
>
State Sunshine Law Update
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2021 5:00:36 PM
Creation date
12/29/2021 4:59:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
"Board Business" Elements <br /> • Within the board's authority <br /> • On current or future agenda <br /> The first element is that board business must be "within the board's authority." If a <br /> matter is something that is purely within the Chair's prerogative, this is not board <br /> business. For example, many boards give their Chair the sole prerogative to set the <br /> agenda, which is not decided on by the board as a whole, so members can ask the <br /> Chair outside of a meeting to place an item on an upcoming agenda. Similarly, many <br /> administrative matters, such as travel arrangements for neighbor island board <br /> members, are not matters within the board's authority. Purely social chit chat is also <br /> not considered board business. But if a matter is about a specific issue that the board <br /> is or will be dealing with, then it clearly would be within the board's authority, and <br /> board members cannot talk to each other about such matters outside of a meeting. <br /> The second element is that the board matter must be an issue on the current or a <br /> future or reasonably foreseeable future agenda. An issue is no longer board business <br /> once the board has finished dealing with it or does not anticipate it coming back before <br /> the board. But if it is an issue that can be reasonably expected to be on a current or <br /> near future agenda, then it could be board business that should not be discussed <br /> outside of a meeting. For example, 01 has issued an opinion involving whether the <br /> Hawaii County Council had violated the Sunshine Law by not noticing a meeting where <br /> a volcanologist had briefed them about Mauna Loa's possible eruption. Because the <br /> Council had no authority over the volcano and there was only a speculative possibility <br /> that future emergency funding would be required at some point, OIP held that this was <br /> not reasonably foreseeable board business at the time. Of course, in a new factual <br /> situation involving an imminent threat, OIP's opinion could be different. <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.