Laserfiche WebLink
WATANABE: But you sold the land with access? <br />MOORE: Yes. <br />WATANABE: How were they going to get there? <br />MOORE: It’s not a practical issue, it’s a legal issue. <br />WATANABE: We’re really dancing around this issue but access is practical. I’m sorry, <br />you can’t have it both ways. If you sold the land in 1938 and you said, don’t worry, Mr. Buyer, <br />you have access but you never owned the right, full rights, to all of the land to which you <br />provided access over, what happened? Do you follow me? <br />MOORE: I follow you. <br />WATANABE: Huh? <br />MOORE: I follow you. <br />WATANABE: Something is wrong. <br />MOORE: Yes. <br />WATANABE: But it’s not an issue that the applicant created. He certainly had nothing to <br />do with the 1938 transaction. <br />MOORE: Correct. <br />WATANABE: This is a tough argument you’re producing. Even for a lay person for me, <br />I mean, you know -. <br />MOORE: It’s, you know, Mr. Watanabe, I’m not presenting that argument, me, as a <br />basis for denying the applicant. I think that’s a planning decision. Okay? I’m just pointing out <br />the facts, that there is this problem legally with respect to access that needs to be resolved. And, <br />in fact, as I mentioned, Shipman has been trying to get this thing resolved with the applicant, you <br />know, almost daily since the last Commission hearing. And we’ve been negotiating with the <br />applicant and actually came very close up until last night in negotiating a settlement with them. <br />So it’s not that Shipman is being obstinate against the applicant. We’ve been cooperating with <br />them and acting in good faith with them in trying to resolve these issues.So it’s not like we’re, <br />you know, just -. <br />WATANABE: All right. And I realize you’re pitch hitting too, so I’m not going to shoot <br />the messenger (jokingly). <br />MOORE: Thank you. <br />WATANABE: Yes, Mr. Woodward. <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />11 <br /> <br />