2007-01-19 twaikoloadevco - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

that area and so I’m aware of the water quality and all that, and since that time we did have the ciguatera issue arise. And perhaps contributing to ciguatera and also contributing to stress on the coral reefs are nutrients coming into the groundwater. Sort of the interplay with the nutrients coming into the groundwater on the land which tend to form a growth of algae in the water, and then the herbivore fish, especially the surgeon fish, tend to feed on those algae, so there is like a little balance there. As long as the nutrients are not excessive and the algae growth is not out of hand at all, then the herbivores cut it back and the whole system functions. And I think when the original permit was granted, the sense was that that could continue to take place. We do have on Maui near Maalaea real problems with algae growing. We have off Waikiki problems with algae sort of taking over and harming the reef. And so my concern at this point is, since 1977 we have like 30 years of experience with water quality that has been monitored and all, but we don’t have that information before us here today. Because Waikoloa is in fact a bay - it’s an embayment - so you don’t have the flushing of the nutrients that you would have on an open ocean exposure. I feel like the nutrient problem could be an issue, and the new golf course adding fertilizer, watering and all that, adding more nutrients to the ground water could potentially be problematic. And so my concern is, you know, I think there has been a lot of evidence accumulated since 1977 on water quality just in that area through the monitoring programs and all. And so I feel like in my own capacity as a Commissioner I’d like to know where we stand and what is the current condition of the ocean in that regard before I say, well, it’s okay to do another golf course, add more nutrients, and that I would still feel confident that exchange of algae growth from nutrients and grazing by the fishes and other marine life can stay in balance; I don’t know that yet. So that’s my own personal concern at this point; and if either of you like to make comment on that, I would be happy to hear. BAIL: Yeah, I would like to acknowledge your concern, and assure you that the Department of Health does regulate water quality and has a whole system of regulation. The way this has been addressed in the permit is to require in Condition 20 that the use of pesticides and herbicides in conjunction with all phases of operation shall conform with the applicable regulations of appropriate government agencies. So there has to be compliance not only with laws applicable to the use of FIFRA and OSHArequirements for the use of pesticides, but also with the Department of Health’s water quality standards. Also imposed under the original permit was the requirement to comply with the Department of Health guidelines applicable to new golf course development. And if the future is a concern, there is a general requirement in Paragraph 27 requiring compliance with all other applicable laws, including requirements of other departments. So, were the Department of Health to revisit its policy on pesticide use and impose a requirement, this provision of the permit would be applicable to that. So we do have an agency overseeing this concern, which has been getting the monitoring results for a period of time. I’m sorry I don’t have those monitoring results with me today and I cannot summarize them for you. To my knowledge there is not a concern that has risen to date, but like I said I don’t have them with me and I haven’t -, I’m not prepared to summarize the results of the water quality monitoring that has already been done. My understanding is that it is to continue and be ongoing, and the purpose of that is to address this very issue with concern of runoff and an impact on the environment. GRAHAM: Thank you. Mr. Yuen? EXHIBIT C 7