Laserfiche WebLink
IWASHITA:I had a-, it€s like a question about the where the Community Development <br />Plan process is for this area at this time. If we€re looking at completion of that process by the <br />Department within the next year or so I don€t know what kind of timeframe. Is this on? <br />ALAMEDA:Director? <br />YUEN:Should be a year or so till the plan is completed then it would go to <br />Planning Commission and Council. This site is General Planned as an urban area under the <br />current County General Plan that was approved in February 2005. <br />ALAMEDA:Follow up? <br />IWASHITA:The reason I bring it up is that the, the level of concerns about traffic and <br />soforthandIthinkyouknowwehave,weeachhaveourviewsandouropinionsaboutyou <br />know how it will, how all of those concerns will be worked out. I really believe that the <br />Community Development Plan process with the developers and the community and getting you <br />know everyone involved especially in this area where I agree with the Director that you know <br />this particular area is going to be a very significant housing area and you know there€s <br />commercial development approved and I think rather than in a piece meal process which we <br />always have to work on and you know work off General Plan urban designation and those kind <br />of things. To me you know that€s the legal basis to go forward, part of it, but it doesn€t really <br />provide a cohesive way to approach development in this significant area that the Community <br />Development Plan process is going to take a year and we€re looking at here a proposal allowing <br />developer 5 years with extensions to get this project started and completed. That I feel it€s <br />probably, I would feel a lot more comfortable that this development, all the other developments <br />in this area would go through the Community Development Plan process and then when the, <br />essentially the community agrees on not just this particular project but this project together with <br />the comprehensive development of this entire triangular area looking at now that€s Ag and gonna <br />be ultimately, according to the General Plan, be used in urban designation that you know we€re <br />looking at right now if this is approved 500 units? More than 500 living units? <br />SIRACUSA:562. <br />IWASHITA:Okay, almost, whatever it is. That ultimately you know we have enough <br />acreage where we can have a thousand, two thousand plus living units. And what we haven€t <br />talked about today is where are all these, the kids that are going to be living in this, in these units, <br />where are they going to go to school? You know I, and looking through all of this material, there <br />is, like maybe 3 sentences that talk about the schools. I think ideally part of the Community <br />Development Plan process should include, seems like there, there€s enough living units in this <br />area to support a school, an elementary school. And so that the kids could walk to school and you <br />know part of the traffic analysis that hasn€t been talked about is that if we have affordable <br />housing which I would expect to have a higher, higher number of children per household, that <br />would be of school age, that hasn€t been addressed at all here. In fact I think it€s, I would <br />characterize the way it€s been not addressed in this proposal. And all of those concerns well that <br />is a major concern I think that, that must be addressed in the Community Development Plan <br />EXHIBIT A <br />14 <br /> <br />