2006-01-20 TLava Kuakini - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

done generically, without a specific design, you know without a specific application. But, so, but this condition is really a matter of caution so the County wont have to bear this kind of cost. But its something that under, under the current design in planning it really probably will not kick in. ALAMEDA:Commissioner Watanabe follow up? WATANABE:No I, thank you. ALAMEDA:Fellow Commissioners our applicants are here. Our staffs here. Do you have follow up Mr. Darrow? DARROW:Thank you Mr. Chairman. I just wanted to answer your question more specific in regards to the updated conditions and also reiterate more specifically Commissioner SiracusasquestionregardingPuaaDevelopmentandSuffolk.PuaaDevelopmentwasrequired in conditions to be able to put in 50 multiple family residential units. And at a time when the commercial gross floor area exceeded 60,000 square feet they were required to add 50 more multiple family residential units. The Suffolk Investment project was a 250 unit affordable rental housing project. So I wanted to reiterate that. In regards to the recent revised conditions as I mentioned prior weve submitted 2 revisions to the Commissioners. The most elaborate was the second revised conditions. If I could just briefly go through the changes these were a big part of our last meeting. Condition C which talks about construction commencement was changed from 3 years to 5 years as far as the effect, the construction commencement. Condition D the change in a wording sense was that the applicant shall generate affordable housing credits on site equal to 50% of the units developed to be more specific. Condition E the sentence was added regarding the TIAR. The TIAR shall include a schedule of improvements describing when each improvement shall be required in the development of the project. Condition G we added the phrase including the intersection with Kuakini Highway and Kuakini Highway improvements phase II as determined by the Department of Public Works. Condition J in our last meeting was quite a lengthy condition. Thats been broken up into Condition H and I to make it a little shorter and basically deals with the issue that the Director spoke about earlier in regards to access to the property at this time and in the future when the Keahole-, Kahului to Keauhou Parkway is constructed. Condition J was just changed, it was previous Condition I and has been relocated after this condition. And then earlier Commissioner Watanabe spoke about the easement on the property and that was, a portion was added. Basically the rest of the conditions again were just minor adjustments. There was one change in the third revision that Id like to bring to your attention and mainly its just to be more specific regarding the construction of project utilities in the right-of-ways of Kuakini Highway and the Kahului to Keauhou Parkway. Condition L it states the applicant shall not install utilities in the Kahului to Keauhou Parkway and Kuakini Highway right-of-ways unless approved by the Department of Public Works. So that should bring you up to speed on the revised conditions. Thank you. ALAMEDA:I will take one more question from the Commissioners and then turn it over to the applicants to-. I just want to get a sense of kind of where theyre at from our discussion cause they might be able to answer some of our further questions. So Commissioner Iwashita? EXHIBIT A 13