My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-01-20 TLava Kuakini
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-01-20 TLava Kuakini
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 9:34:40 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 9:34:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SIRACUSA:Thank you and do you remember more or less how many units were <br />talking about for those 2? <br />DARROW:If you can give me one second. <br />SIRACUSA:Just, just general figures. <br />DARROW:I believe it was 250 affordablehousing rental units for Suffolk and then <br />Puaa was a commercial development but the Director also required I believe 50 houses to be <br />constructed at one point and then as commercial development grew then it was required to build <br />an additional 50 units for that particular project. <br />SIRACUSA:So, if we add these 212 units to those figures youre looking at well over <br />500unitswithinthatcircumscribedarea.Thankyou.SoImthinkingaboutcumulativetraffic <br />impacts here. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. <br />SIRACUSA:Just to let you know where my mind is working on. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Other questions for our staff? Commissioner? Lets go to <br />Commissioner Graham and then Commissioner Watanabe. Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:All right since I was the lone dissenting voter at our last meeting where we <br />had only 5 Commissioners I just wanted to bring forth to the Commissioners and to the public <br />you know remind what was the essence of my nay vote. And it basically was the traffic issue <br />that Commissioner Siracusa alludes to right now. And in this case if you notice in our <br />background report on this proposal, Exhibit C is from the Department of Public Works and Mr. <br />Emler testified before us last time. And in the first page of that Exhibit C in his bold face type he <br />recommended that the applicant should not be given this development entitlement until Kuakini <br />Highway was widened to 4 lanes in front of the project or that if it were to be given that it would <br />be conditioned on the completion of that widening. And we also got a letter from the Kona <br />Traffic Safety Committee and Mr. Gimpel is also here today and referring to the same thing that <br />the infrastructure in the area doesnt really support all the additional traffic that would be <br />generated. So, in addition to saying that I would maybe take this opportunity as the Planning <br />Director if you would indicate to us why it is then in this particular instance you chose to go <br />against the recommendation of the Department of Public Works and recommend favorable <br />approval? <br />ALAMEDA:Director? <br />YUEN:Sure. We have a terrible housing problem in, well on the island as a <br />whole. And in Kailua Kona particularly. Although we have a lot of housing being produced <br />almost none of its being produced at affordable levels because its being done on zoning that <br />either occurred without affordable housing conditions or projects that were released from <br />EXHIBIT A <br />5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.