Laserfiche WebLink
TAKEMOTO:Where are you? <br />GRAHAM:Just before Condition 6 would be good, maybe, since 6 talks about <br />construction. <br />TAKEMOTO:Okay, okay, very good. <br />SPRINGER:So that would be a new condition and all subsequent conditions would be <br />renumbered? <br />TAKEMOTO:Yeah. <br />SPRINGER:So we€re inserting a new Condition 6? <br />TAKEMOTO:Okay. <br />GRAHAM:Yes-. <br />SPRINGER:Isthatcorrect? <br />GRAHAM:AnewCondition6. <br />SPRINGER:Commissioner Graham. <br />GRAHAM:I also wanted to comment on the one that Mr. Takemoto changed a short <br />while ago about interest of the SMA Law. It does seem like the second sentence doesn€t follow <br />since the word is being removed, or used in the second sentence. <br />TAKEMOTO:In finding 40? <br />GRAHAM:Pardon? Finding, yeah, 50, number 40. Cause you say, These <br />improvements,‚ and These improvements‚ have been disappeared already from the first <br />sentence. Maybe we can just get rid of that second sentence, huh? <br />The way you read the first sentence to, as you replaced the word improvements‚ with interest‚ <br />and then in the second sentence it refers to These improvements,‚ but These improvements‚ <br />doesn€t really have anything to refer to anymore. <br />TAKEMOTO:No, actually, thank you for catching that. I think it should read, There is <br />not a relationship or nexus between the improvements requested by DPW and the interest <br />protected by the SMA Law.‚ <br />GRAHAM:Okay. So it should be an insertion what you said first -? <br />TAKEMOTO:Yes. <br /> <br />