Laserfiche WebLink
GRAHAM:Not a replacement? <br />TAKEMOTO: Yes. <br />SIRACUSA:Right, not a deletion. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. <br />TAKEMOTO:So it would read There is not a relationship or nexus between the <br />improvements requested by DPW for Seaview Circleand the interest protected by the SMA <br />Law.‚ <br />GRAHAM:Okay. <br />TAKEMOTO:Andthenthesecondsentencecanstay. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. <br />TAKEMOTO:Yeah,good.Thankyou. <br />SPRINGER:Commissioners,arethereanyfurtheramendments,additions,deletions? <br />Mr. Jung, you€ve heard our discussion here. We€ve been discussing amendments to Finding 40, <br />Finding 54 and insertion of a new Condition 6. Do you have any comment? <br />JUNG:They would all seem acceptable, your Madam Chairperson. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you, sir. Members, I think we€re at a point where we€re ready to <br />make and vote on a motion on this matter to, the motion would be to accept the Findings and <br />Conclusions as amended. Mr. Torigoe, is that -? <br />TORIGOE:The rules basically at this point allows you to proceed to reverse, modify <br />or adopt the recommendations of the Hearings Officer. <br />SPRINGER:So they would be with modifications, would that be the proper language? <br />TORIGOE:Yes. The motion could, if you intend to adopt it with modifications, that€s <br />what the motion would be. <br />SPRINGER:We€ve heard Mr. Torigoe€s guidance for us. Members, do we, is someone <br />prepared to make a motion? <br />MCCALL:I€ll make a stab at it. <br />SPRINGER:Okay, thank you, Commissioner McCall. <br />MCCALL:In the matter of the SMA Permit to allow the development -. <br /> <br />