My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-12-16 Leeward Exh D (Items 1 thru 6)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-12-16 Leeward Exh D (Items 1 thru 6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2022 3:26:23 PM
Creation date
1/20/2022 3:26:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
VITOUSEK: Commissioner Yates, second, okay, thank you. Now we are into the discussion <br /> period, so if any Commissioners have any discussion, if they want to state, you know, their <br /> support or opposition at this time, it's allowable. Otherwise, we can proceed with secondary <br /> motions to amend the motion on the floor to approve SMA 2001[sic]-4. <br /> So, personally, I think that the conditions that we've worked with the applicant to create will <br /> serve to mitigate a lot of the adverse effects of the project. I would be willing to support the <br /> project with the amendments that we've all discussed already. If that I guess I can make a <br /> motion to amend the motion that's on the floor? And help me out with all of the amendments <br /> that we've got. So the first one was <br /> DEFRANCO: Construction? <br /> VITOUSEK: The roadway? <br /> JACKSON: Chair Vitousek? <br /> VITOUSEK: Yes. <br /> JACKSON: This is Maija. So my understanding was that the roadway connector was just going <br /> to be placed in the rezone ordinances. <br /> VITOUSEK: Correct, correct. <br /> JACKSON: So the two conditions that I show for SMA Permit number 4 related to Area B, <br /> which is the 900-unit time shares, is an initial five-year administrative time extension, and then <br /> your language that you proposed related to handling time extensions before the Commission's <br /> and consideration of changes in the surrounding environment. I have that in writing; I can show <br /> it to the Commission, if need be. And then the other condition that may apply to this is the <br /> public access plan update that had been discussed previously. Those are the two I show. <br /> VITOUSEK: Correct, yeah, I think that's right for the SMA component. So I move to amend <br /> the motion on the floor to incorporate the two amendments that were discussed by Maija. Is that <br /> enough detail or do we need to read it out? <br /> JACKSON: I can put the language of both conditions up, once we hear a second, if we do hear a <br /> second, so that the Commission can see the actual wording. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay. <br /> DEFRANCO: [Raises hand to second] <br /> VITOUSEK: Second by Commissioner DeFranco? Okay, second by Commissioner DeFranco. <br /> 26 <br /> EXHIBIT D <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.