My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-12-16 Leeward Exh D (Items 1 thru 6)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-12-16 Leeward Exh D (Items 1 thru 6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2022 3:26:23 PM
Creation date
1/20/2022 3:26:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
JACKSON: Okay. So this is not complete. The initial time extension[starts typing on shared <br /> screen] <br /> VITOUSEK: It will be after the initial administrative time extension or—okay, okay, I see what <br /> you are doing, never mind. So I guess, yeah, project will construct, be constructed within five <br /> years. <br /> JACKSON: Sorry about this, my typing skills are not the best[continues typing]. I think that's <br /> where you were going for, Chair, but we can use our standard language that we typically use. <br /> VITOUSEK: Yep, yes, that sounds good. <br /> JACKSON: And we would add this underneath. <br /> VIOTUSEK: Okay. All right, that sounds good to me. And then the language that was shown <br /> on the screen for the other condition, that one is good with me as well. <br /> JACKSON: Yes, and Tracy can share that with you. This was the public access plan. <br /> VIOUSEK: Okay. So those would be the amendments being proposed. <br /> FUKE: Mr. Chairman, can I, I just wanted to clarify with staff, you know, this is in regards to <br /> the time extension, so, as I understand that there would be like two separate conditions relating to <br /> this aspect; one is like establishing the construction timetable, and two would be a separate <br /> condition related specifically to any extensions that may be required. Is that correct? <br /> VITOUSEK: That's correct, yeah, that's what we are hoping for. So we had the language that <br /> Mr. Fuke read indicating what the construction timetable would be, with the five years to <br /> commence, the 15 years for 50 percent, another 10 years for the remaining, subject to initial <br /> administrative time extension from the planning director, and then any subsequent applications <br /> for an extension would trigger the condition to evaluate the project based on the current <br /> conditions at that time. <br /> FUKE: Yes, thank you very much, Mr. Chair, and acceptable. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay, we'll proceed with a roll call vote on theOh, Commissioner Yates, yes. <br /> Commissioner Yates. <br /> YATES: On the - - -part of the amendment, they say "an applicant" or is it—anyway, I'm just <br /> wanting to - - - specifically to this applicant or any applicant. Rewording or the re <br /> VITOUSEK: Right, it would be this applicant, it would be to this applicant of this permit, <br /> correct. <br /> YATES: Okay, so that would be changed because it says, "an applicant." <br /> 27 <br /> EXHIBIT D <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.