My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-01-21 TSUFFOLKOPUAA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-01-21 TSUFFOLKOPUAA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 9:43:44 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 9:43:29 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FUKE:Sure. <br />SPRINGER:Please? <br />FUKE:Okay. Relative to the amendments, the suggested amendments to <br />Suffolks project, we would like to suggest that Conditions F, G andI, F, G andI relate <br />to making improvements to the extension of the Queen Kaahumanu Highway, you know, <br />the traffic light, so on and so forth. G and I relate to the improvements to the 60 foot <br />wide mauka-makai road, you know, through the property, and I refers to the <br />improvements to Kuakini Highway. Now, if you look at all of those conditions, none of <br />those conditions say when those improvements have to be in. And, so, what were <br />suggesting out of good faith and, you know, just out of clarity, and I think its kind of <br />understood but we would suggest that, you know, you just tack on the last sentence and, <br />you know, add to the last sentence to all of those conditions. And thatwould read as <br />follows:Saidimprovementsshallbecompletedpriortotheissuanceofacertificateof <br />occupancy for non-residential structures or final inspection of any residential structures. <br />SPRINGER:Commissioners, any questions on this amendment? Thank you. <br />Mr. Fuke? <br />FUKE:And on Condition L, what -. <br />SIRACUSA:Page -? <br />SPRINGER:Were on page 3 of the conditions. Were looking at the change of <br />zone application. <br />SIRACUSA:Oh, okay, okay. Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you, Mr. Fuke. <br />SPRINGER:Were looking at the Change of Zone application. Thank you, <br />Mr. Fuke. <br />FUKE:Sure. On Condition L, what we wanted to do is just to clarify this <br />restriction. Because as its currently written, it would prohibit non-habitable structures or <br />improvements within the Zone AE or the shaded Zone X area. For example, you can <br />have the project and, you know, you would want to have like your driveway or your <br />landscaping or improvements in that area. That would be prohibited just based upon the <br />language. So what we would like to suggest is that if you delete the first sentence and <br />then you start with what I had suggested like, No residential structures shall be <br />constructed within areas designated AE or shaded Zone X by the FIRM map, as <br />amended, etc., etc. And then the, and I think the intent is like, you know, to have the <br />restriction, you know, of this relative to single-family residential lots, although the <br />Applicant does not have any plans to have single-family residential lots, but to have the <br />restrictive covenants be applicable only to single-family residential lots, and that no <br />18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.