Laserfiche WebLink
single-family residential lots may be created which lack a buildable area. So I just kind <br />of like wanted to make this separation, because I think theintent of that condition was <br />two-fold. One is to make sure that, you know, you don€t build structures where people <br />are going to utilize in a floodway, and that€s understandable. And so we wanted to just <br />clarify that to say like, well, there may be other improvements that could go within the <br />AE areas, such as your roadway, your landscaping, you know; and if you€re going to <br />have your park area maybe some improvements that are non-habitable, you know, they <br />should be allowed within the AE area without having an absolute prohibition as initially <br />recommended. <br />And, secondly, if there are going to be any single-family residential lot subdivision, <br />although the zoning would allow it but, you know, that€s not the intent, but in the event <br />that there are single-family residential lots then what you want to do is make sure that the <br />respective lot owners know that they cannot build within any portion of the property <br />that€sdesignatedZoneAEorshadedX.Sothatwasmorejustdesignedforclarification. <br />SPRINGER:Thankyou,Mr.Fuke.Mr.Takemoto,doyouhaveanycomment <br />on this proposal? <br />TAKEMOTO:I understand the AE. Why Zone X? <br />FUKE:What is the shaded Zone X? <br />TAKEMOTO:Yeah. <br />FUKE:I had to ask your staff. Maybe Mr. Hayashi can explain that. <br />HAYASHI:The shaded Zone X is an area that€s designated for 500-year <br />flooding. <br />TAKEMOTO:No problem with your clarifications. <br />SPRINGER:I just have a question. Your fourth amendment there, the insertion <br />of the words, If appropriate a copy of the proposed covenants.‚ What would be an <br />example of the inappropriate case? <br />FUKE:Well, if there€s no single-family residential lots. <br />SPRINGER:I see. <br />FUKE:Yeah. So that was the intent, yeah. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. Commissioners, we€ve heard the proposed <br />amendments on the Suffolk Development conditions. Do you have any questions or <br />comments on them? <br />19 <br /> <br />