2005-01-21 TSUFFOLKOPUAA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

100 Pauahi Street in Hilo, Hawai i. As the Corporation Counsel had noted, I would like to request that, you know, provided that theres no objection on the part of either the Commission or the public, to have like the material thats presented relative to the item before you, which is the Suffolk application, also the applicable, you know, to the subsequent application, inasmuch as the, not purely in interest of time, but more in the interest of having a comprehensive understanding of both projects. Because from an infrastructure standpoint, they are closely tied. From a functional standpoint, they are also very closely tied. The only difference is that they are two different developers. SPRINGER:Mr. Fuke, then what youre proposing is that we would hear a consolidated presentation on matters of infrastructure and function but we would go through the decision-making separately for each application? FUKE:If the Commission and the public would not have any objection, wewouldrequestthatso. SPRINGER:Thankyou,Mr.Fuke.Commissioners,doyouunderstandthe request, have any questions on it or comments? Commissioner McCall? MCCALL:Its fine with me. SPRINGER:Commissioner Siracusa, you affirm that, also? SIRACUSA:Yes. SMITH:Thats fine with me. SPRINGER:Commissioner Smith, thats positive. Commissioner Graham? GRAHAM:Which are the two were combining? SPRINGER:Four and five, Suffolk and Puaa. GRAHAM:Okay. SPRINGER:And the combination is strictly on infrastructure and a general discussion of function. Decision-making will still occur separately. Is that correct? FUKE:Yes. SPRINGER:From the members of the public, is there any objection to that? Thank you. Mr. Fuke, you may continue. Im sorry, Mr. Darrow, you may continue. DARROW:Thank you, Madam Chair. If I may address a few in-house issues first. This is a continued hearing for Suffolk Investment LLC, as well as Puaa Development. Previously, the Background Report and exhibits have been distributed to 3