My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-01-30 TDoutor Coffee
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-01-30 TDoutor Coffee
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 9:57:57 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 9:57:41 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
KUBOTA:But you're saying also -. <br />O'TOOLE:Well, you know, the Applicant -. <br />KUBOTA:Yeah. Okay. <br />O'TOOLE:If he wants to make a motion, there are certain motions he can make. He <br />cannot make a motion to this effect, that's why I'm saying it has to be a Commission member to <br />make a motion to amend, if you can, but it's not the Applicant who can make this motion. <br />FUJIKAWA:There would be -. <br />O'TOOLE:So right now there is no motion on the table. <br />KUBOTA:Right. <br />O'TOOLE:It's just an agenda item. <br />KUBOTA:I understand that. I understand that. But see, I guess the clarity that I <br />want from you is that the violation and all of these pictures that come with it are not part of our <br />consideration for the decision making today. It's a separate item or is it connected to one another <br />is, I guess, my question? <br />O'TOOLE:Well, I don't see the connection, but when we let the parties make their <br />presentations, I'm sure Mr. Yuen will argue why it is. <br />KUBOTA:Okay. Well, I wanted to hear your opinion, and that's my understanding <br />of it, and you're saying they're not connected. <br />O'TOOLE:I don't see it at this point. <br />KUBOTA:Thank you. <br />FUJIKAWA:Commissioner Graham, go ahead. <br />GRAHAM:To our Legal Counsel, again. Pat, I wasn't here for the last meeting which <br />is the meeting where this became an agenda item, but when I read <br />motion from Commissioner Fujikawa, where he says, "Can I make a motion to amend on the <br />conditions on this Doutor Coffee application of Special Permit No. 1215?" And then there was a <br />second. And subsequently, Commissioner Galdones asked Commissioner Fujikawa to amend <br />that motion to incorporate that this be placed on the next agenda, but not to have the -. He didn't <br />ask that this be placed on the next agenda replace what his original motion was, just that the <br />motion be amended to incorporate that. So I'm wondering whether <br />Commissioner Fujikawa made is not the motion that, in fact, is still in play for us. Now that <br />motion was approved. So you say there's no motion on the table <br />motion. Do you understand what my confusion is there, whether - <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.