Laserfiche WebLink
tight. So, if we have two maps and then the community comments, then we only have <br /> like two weeks to pull it all together so. I yield. <br /> YOSHINA: Chair Kossow. <br /> KOSSOW: Mr. Yoshina. <br /> YOSHINA: Sort of going along with that idea, is there a way to impose one map on <br /> another map? Just to see where the differences are. And then perhaps making the <br /> adjustments at those difference points. <br /> KOSSOW: From my understanding, Mr. Yoshina, I don't believe so. <br /> YOSHINA: Okay, thank you. <br /> KOSSOW: Do we have any other discussion? <br /> HUSTACE: Chair. <br /> KOSSOW: Mr. Hustace. <br /> HUSTACE: I think given—To answer Mr. Yoshina's question, it could be possible. <br /> We'd have to ask Mr. Jones to do some more tech stuff on the map software though. Just <br /> like how we are allowed to—One of the layers you can see, you can see the boundary <br /> lines. So, if I'm looking at the Chair's map, Working Draft Number 1, I can turn on one <br /> of the layers that looks at the current Council map. So it kind of is superimposed that <br /> way. I think we just have to ask more of Mr. Jones to do that. If we wanted to create these <br /> additional layers of the two working draft maps. I don't know if we're there, at a moment <br /> where we're comfortable with both of them to be. The current situation they are, I don't <br /> think we're that comfortable, still kind of working some kinks out. Thanks. <br /> YOSHINA: Yeah. It seems to me that we are almost in agreement. There's just some <br /> small tweaks to bring both maps into congruence. So, if the idea is to create two maps to <br /> present to the general public, that's okay with me. But I would think that we're almost to <br /> the point where we're in agreement on the maps. Thank you. <br /> KOSSOW: Mr. Lopez. <br /> LOPEZ: Good summary comments. Thank you, Chair, first for that summarization you <br /> did of what the differences might be. I like Ms. Lui's recommendation. Although, I agree <br /> that we can't just produce one map. We got to have others. So, here's a what if. We have <br /> two maps on the table that you folks agreed were a good starting point to begin the final <br /> deliberations. And then we had some agreement today for the two, you gentlemen, the <br /> Chair and Vice Chair to work together to bring all this together, all the comments, <br /> produce a third map. So maybe, how about those are the three maps that we present to the <br /> public? So, in effect, we have it. Just an idea. Thank you. <br /> 28 <br />