PD BACKGROUND REPORT (PL-REZ-2022-015_AMEND REZ-05-027)

Home

3. a 60-foot wide structural setback in lieu of the required 30-foot setback along the existing property's public street frontage to provide an additional buffer." As noted earlier, the time required to complete the subdivision, even with an administrative extension, expired on June 2016. This delay was due, in part, to a litigation among the prior owners of the property, which then affected the Applicant to have clear title to the property until nearly 2016 Notwithstanding this delay,please note that tentative subdivision approval was timely secured on July 10, 2007(Exhibit D) Further, construction plans were prepared, submitted, and approved on August 26,2008. (Exhibit E) Because of the litigation among the then owners of the property, the project stopped, resulting in the Planning Department nullifying the tentative approval on March 22, 2011. Please note that the plan submitted for tentative approval as reflected in the approved construction plans on August 26, 2008, includes the easements and setbacks. (Figure 2) The applicant intends to maintain and reflect these easements and setbacks in its subdivision submittal. Further, while the construction plans have been approved, they will have to be updated and recertified by the various governmental agencies subsequent to the issuance of tentative subdivision approval of the new application. Should the time extension or new rezoning ordinance be approved, the Applicant intends to immediately submit its subdivision application to the County. As the construction plans need to be updated and recertified by the various governmental agencies—and this time by a new engineer, due to the passing of the former engineer—the Applicant hopes to begin making the required improvements by the middle or end of next year and secure final approval by early 2023. F. "Restrictive covenant(s)in the deeds of all the proposed agricultural lots fronting existing roads shall specific and uphold the easements and setbacks set forth in Condition D. The restrictive covenant(s) shall also specify that, including the area comprising the forest reserve easements described in Condition D,no less than eighty percent(80%) of the entire lot area shall be retained in forest. A copy of the proposed covenant(s) to be recorded with the Bureau of Conveyances shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval prior to the issuance of Final Subdivision Approval. A copy of the approved covenant(s) shall be recited in an instrument executed by the applicant and the County and recorded with the Bureau of Conveyances prior to the issuance of Final Subdivision Approval." This condition has not been fulfilled. It will, however, be done immediately upon securing tentative subdivision approval. The Applicant, however, requests 3