My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022-04-07 Windward Exh B (Item 1 Holcomb PL-SMA-2021-007)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2022
>
2022-04-07 Windward Exh B (Item 1 Holcomb PL-SMA-2021-007)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2022 7:09:27 AM
Creation date
5/6/2022 7:09:20 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
reasonable and the right idea. I'm just a little bit, I would like to see it a little bit stronger. Could <br /> we just say allow access with and then also include managed access? <br /> AU: Excuse me, Commissioner Galimba can we just stick to questions first and then we can go <br /> into discussion and deliberation after a motion. So, maybe if you just have a question for either <br /> staff— <br /> GALIMBA: It was a question to him to see if they would consider that, but we can wait. <br /> AU: Okay, sorry, I'm sorry for cutting you off, but did the applicant and the team get that <br /> question? <br /> KNABLE: It's something that, it's tough because we're in a situation where our properties <br /> landlocked and we only have access to the property through an easement that's recorded against <br /> the adjoining property for access we have. You'll notice by the application we're only focusing <br /> on this piece of property because and not improvements in the driveway section or the easement <br /> area to the highway because we have no contact with the adjoining landowner. Reservations in <br /> our deed don't provide for our ability to grant or create access easements for other purposes other <br /> than the current allowable use which is access and utility. Ideally, we wanted to come in and do <br /> some improvements within the access easement, but ultimately, we found out that because of the <br /> way that the language was written, we don't have those rights. So thus, we don't have the right <br /> also as well to grant formal public access. <br /> So, we think the way that we're proposing this managed access is something that we're still able <br /> to take care of the fishermen. We're basically calling them invitees so they can be invited over <br /> the easement area to our property without running into issues with the adjoining landowner. And <br /> the idea would be to get into a situation where we would have managed management agreement <br /> with either with a local fishing association or even have our own land manager of our choosing <br /> kind of manage that. And, quite frankly, Kelly he's coming here, he wants to create a home for <br /> his family when they retire, which should be hopefully a few years and he wants to have that <br /> relationship with the fishermen. He has friends in the community, he recognizes that it's a very <br /> important issue for them and he's committed to making sure that these fishermen have access as <br /> long as they want and as long as they're able to kind of adhere to some of the rules that would be <br /> setting up to ensure the liability protection that he needs. I hope that helps to answer your <br /> question. <br /> GALIMBA: Thank you, that context is really helpful, and I do really appreciate how thorough <br /> your work is in writing this all up. It's really excellent. <br /> KNABLE: I appreciate that. <br /> GALIMBA: Yeah. <br /> KNABLE: We have a good team. <br /> 7 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.