Laserfiche WebLink
AU: Thank you, Commissioner Galimba for the question. Any other questions for either staff or <br /> the applicant? Okay, with no more questions or could I get a motion on the application, and we <br /> can discuss? <br /> DE LUZ: Motion to accept with the one revision on the timeline. <br /> GALIMBA: Second. <br /> AU: Okay, so the motion was to accept the SMA permit with the amendment stated by staff and <br /> motion was made by Commissioner De Luz and seconded by Commissioner Galimba. Okay, so <br /> we made the motion and got a second Commissioners do you have any discussions? <br /> LIN: Chair, I believe Director Kern has a question. <br /> AU: Go ahead Commissioner Kern. <br /> KERN: I get to be a commissioner again? <br /> AU: Aw, I'm sorry. <br /> KERN: Lucky me, I missed those days. No worries, hello everyone, nice to see you all. I just <br /> wanted to talk really briefly about this public access conversation. It's a tricky one. Certainly, <br /> some heartburn around it from a Planning Department perspective we don't want to block or <br /> limit public access that's for sure. Also want to make sure that what we're promoting or <br /> encouraging is safe for folks and with hearing what the applicant was willing to work with the <br /> fishermen and with the group. Thus, the language that we came up with is presented the way <br /> that it is I figured that there would be discussion today amongst the Commissioners and the <br /> applicant and possibly some tweaks so that language. It's like I said it's a tricky one for all the <br /> reasons that Jason says, and the safety side of it and we're actually going to be having some <br /> other meetings on the side to really define where those lines are drawn. <br /> As far as opening it up and then liability to the owner, to the County, and that was some of the <br /> concern on our side from the County side of what liability exists, if it's mandated. But I would <br /> like to also point you out to Condition 3 where the applicant has to substantially comply with the <br /> representations that are made. So, that's another backup as far as they've expressed very clearly <br /> what their plan is, how they're going to go approach this with obviously a little bit of room to <br /> massage it, so it works. And so, with that I feel comfortable that those fishermen that use that <br /> place will be honored and that to me is really that intent or a mechanism for others that might <br /> want to fish and go taken down there for them to do that. <br /> But really open to a dialogue around this if you folks want to adjust a little bit, I'm not going to <br /> have any issues with that. Just wanted to share that this one's a bit tricky and there was a lot of <br /> thought that went into it and happy to hear what everybody has to say and we're going to be <br /> working further to again kind of understand better ways to make this happen. Thank you for sure <br /> but thank you for the opportunity to share. <br /> 8 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />