My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-02-02 TKOOB
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-02-02 TKOOB
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 10:17:19 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 10:17:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
KOOB: One farm dwelling and then an approved second farm dwelling. <br />STRAUSS: There was plan or talk of potentially coming back to the Planning <br />Commission through the Planning Department to seek additional structures if it was needed to <br />provide additional guest houses. But that’s not under this special permit and that’s not being <br />offered now. <br />RHO: Well, okay. So then I guess my last comment or question is the material <br />that we have it seems like it conflicts at various points. Because if the plan changed or <br />something else is happening with whatever is given to us, which makes it confusing, that’s <br />number one, this thing is not blacked out. It’s number 26 and, you know, it reads like I just read <br />it. <br />STRAUSS: Right. <br />RHO: So I guess my suggestion is that somebody needs to go through this stuff <br />and black it out; and that’s not applicable anymore because you guys or somebody made a <br />change. Cause I’m reading this thing at face value. <br />STRAUSS: I understand. There aren’t 20 units. But if there became 20 units through <br />a later seeking of additional entitlements, that would have to be issued through the Planning <br />Commission for an additional or an amendment to the special permit. The problem is this, if you <br />were a qualified investor and you thought the project was only limited to 13, now you’ve got a <br />potential problem if say there’s now 20. So the disclosure that was made is they may seek as <br />many as 20, but there’s only 13 that are planned, and there’s only 13 that are permitted. But it is <br />to prevent someone from later on as a qualified investor say, hey, I expected there’d only be 13 <br />and I don’t like the increased density now that you’ve applied for it. And the intent was to <br />provide them that there may be as many as 20 applied for in the future. That’s it. <br />RHO: Okay, so my last comment or question, actually it’s a question, where in <br />the document, and you don’t have to do that right now, but where in the document would I know, <br />would tell me as a prospective member, qualified member, that I could not occupy one or two <br />with my wife and two kids? <br />KOOB: Can I answer that? <br />STRAUSS: Sure. <br />GRAHAM: That’s Mr. Koob, huh? <br />KOOB: Yes, Mr. Koob, sorry. For one I noticed where it says here, for example, <br />1/3 cluster, this is in the materials given to you that we had copies of, equals two cottages with a <br />private bath. So an option, 1/3 provides for 1 percent interest in the LLC, and the construction of <br />two cottages, one of which may be used as an individual staff/faculty retreat space. So it’d be <br />clarified for each of these options that only one cottage is usable as staff or faculty as approved <br />by the special use permit. And then as far as somebody coming and being a staff or faculty <br /> EXHIBIT C 19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.