2007-02-02 TKOOB - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

STRAUSS: I think that’s possible. The discussions that we’ve had with the Planning Department over the past few months have been kind of like this, informational meetings and exchange of ideas, but, and certain concerns have been raised. When I was going to college I sold cars to pay for my education. And part of the technique involved in striking a deal is would you take somebody. Well, if I could do this would you take it today? You know, if we could do that, would you take it today? And we haven’t reached that point of clearly identifying what would satisfy the Planning Department, the Planning Director. We are aware of concerns; and some of them have to do I think with philosophical ideas on what constitutes land and property entitlements. But others have to do with making sure that the project is properly represented to potential investors and also that it meets the confines, the metes and bounds of the special permit. And so, yes, it may be very productive to do that and we’ll certainly try to do that. The agenda item identifies the determination by the Planning Commission as to whether the financing and marketing plan is consistent with the special permit, not what’s on the ground. I mean that was the concern that was identified to be raised, is the financing and marketing plan. And that’s relatively simple to reign in or revise. In fact, it’s possible that there need be no more marketing plan because of the number of people that are already interested in participating that we wouldn’t have to have any additional marketing out there. We wouldn’t have to have the areas on the protected part of the website or even discuss it with anyone else.It’s a matter of potentially just calling through the people that have already expressed interest in making sure they’re qualified. So, yes, I think it could potentially be done that way. But some of the concerns that I hear raised have to do with matters other than the marketing program, it had to do with how many permanent people may be here. And I think on some of that we’re sort of getting away from what the special permit provides for. The task that two other attorneys and I had in connection with this project was to come up with a way of financing a project consistent with the special permit, within the bounds of the special permit in terms of the number of structures that could be built, the ancillary structures that could be built, the number of guest rooms that needed to be dedicated to guest rooms, and the number of rooms that needed to be dedicated to staff. And we think that we accomplished all that; and so that these issues about other concerns, as legitimate as they may be, were not things that we contemplated at that time. Because it was designed and driven by the special permit itself, not a way to get around the special permit but to implement the special permit. GRAHAM: Yeah, I understand that. Somehow I don’t feel like you’re answering my question directly. But maybe that’s by choice, not by omission, huh? STRAUSS: Well, I’m sorry. I thought your question was do you think that if we were to address the concerns of the Planning Director could we resolve this. GRAHAM: No. My concern, my question was, I think one of the features of your financing and marketing plan is one which assigns a specific real estate piece, you know, maybe not metes and bounds but a particular hale which someone constructs or lives in or has rights to. And I’m saying I think that is the heart maybe of what’s problematic for the Planning Director. So if you were to omit that portion in your financing and marketing plan, in other words the gentleman doesn’t have assigned to him, one, he’s going to build or something, but he merely EXHIBIT C 21