My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022_04_19 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2022
>
2022_04_19 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2022 12:57:57 PM
Creation date
5/11/2022 12:57:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />RM: I think Diana is the pipe gate is gonna be where the red line – where the rocks are now. <br /> <br />DML: OK. <br /> <br />RM: So it’s gonna be on a County property – we need to get into an agreement with them to allow <br />ingress/egress access to the property but also we need to define the roles and responsibilities… <br /> <br />DML: Right… <br /> <br />RM: ….of that gate and any vandalisms and maintenance that’s required on that road. Because <br />technically that road – that fence – the current fence currently the way it stands – technically it <br />should be on our property line which is right on DLNR’s property line as well, but when they <br />designed that site they allowed for that stretch of land so we could be able to go outside and <br />maintain our fence within our own property. <br /> <br />DML: I see… <br /> <br />RM: And that’s the reason they allowed that 24’ easement for, to be able to get in there and do <br />repair on the fence and what have you – the intention was, like I said, it’s not a public access, it’s <br />not a public road, it’s absolutely part of the transfer station properties but we can definitely, like <br />Mike said, we need to come up with a reasonable solution that everybody can live with and I <br />think to do that is we work with DLNR and we also want to work with the Commission to make <br />sure that it’s satisfactory, you know, action or mitigation that we trying to do, so, and that’s why <br />I opened the first time open the question is this is our intention in what we’re trying to do so but <br />the current situation is definitely unacceptable so if you guys want to add more solution to it we <br />can entertain it. <br /> <br />DML: It would be helpful to me, Ramzi, and this Diana again, just to hear what the Commission thinks <br />it needs… <br /> <br />RM: Exactly… <br /> <br />DML: Are we talking about people driving back there or keeping it to foot access only? <br /> <br />RM: Right, exactly, that’s what we need to hear. <br /> <br />SM: Stanley, from the public. Did you guys have a public notice on this – that you guys just put the <br />boulders there or you guys put out something so the public would know that it’s – now you <br />cannot go there? And, when it happened? Mike or….? <br /> <br />RM: I don’t know if the staff put a public notice but once again, people shouldn’t be on that road <br />anyway, it’s part of the transfer station operation. <br /> <br />SM: I would think, though, that if that’s the case then that’s supposed to be from years ago that the <br />hunters know about this situation. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.