My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022-04-21 Leeward Exh D (Item 3&4 Hawaii One1 PL-REZ-2021-014&PL-SMA-2022-012)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2022
>
2022-04-21 Leeward Exh D (Item 3&4 Hawaii One1 PL-REZ-2021-014&PL-SMA-2022-012)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2022 5:34:45 PM
Creation date
5/19/2022 5:34:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
appreciate the favorable recommendation by the Planning Director on both the amendment <br /> requests. <br /> The focus of the amendment request is pretty straightforward, and it's really asking for more <br /> time in which to complete the subdivision and more specifically to the Condition K within the <br /> Change of Zone ordinances to provide that opportunity where the drainage system improvements <br /> can be constructed at the same time with the other subdivision improvements, say, the water, the <br /> roads, and the sewer system. <br /> The applicant, as staff mentioned, purchased the property in foreclosure in 2013 about four years <br /> after the Change of Zone and State Land Use Boundary amendment and SMA permits were <br /> issued. In those seven years since the applicant has made very diligent efforts to pursue and <br /> complete the subdivision as prescribed by those approvals. And I won't go through it because <br /> staff was very thorough in discussing it, but their efforts, as mentioned earlier, did include <br /> obtaining a Planned Unit Development permit from the County Planning Department, getting <br /> SHPD approvals for both the burial treatment and data recovery plans, designing and then filing <br /> a subdivision application in 2017, then also at the same time working with the county in <br /> designing and securing the approvals for the proposed three-acre La`aloa Park located to the <br /> north of the project site, and that included an environmental assessment and issuance of a finding <br /> of no significant impact, applying for Plan Approval for the park as well. And also the <br /> subsequent year, the following year I should mention, the applicant also made efforts to purchase <br /> the property located to the west or makai of the project site in order to facilitate the construction <br /> of the Pi`ilani Street, which will provide direct access to the subdivision from Alii Drive. The <br /> applicant was successful in securing tentative subdivision approval for the first phase, which <br /> consists of 18 single-family residential lots and went through great effort to design all of the <br /> subdivision improvements, the civil work, for which they were able to get the County approval <br /> in 2019. Even though you may not see a lot of activity on the ground, I think the applicant in the <br /> presentation and as I've discussed has clearly demonstrated a significant amount of efforts in <br /> getting the necessary approvals and permits in order to secure final subjection approval. <br /> Unfortunately, at the end of 2019 they informed the Planning Department that they lost funding, <br /> and that's when basically everything came to a stop. <br /> In order for them to seek out additional sources of funding to complete the subdivision, they <br /> need and require these amendments to the entitlements both the Change of Zone and the SMA <br /> permits in order for them to go ahead and try to find those alternate sources of funding. <br /> As confirmed by the Planning Director in his recommendation report, there have been no <br /> significant changes in the General Plan or the Zoning Code relative to the project area. It <br /> continues to remain consistent with the goals, policies, and standards of the General Plan relative <br /> to economic and land use elements of the Plan. The project itself is considered infill by the Kona <br /> Community Development Plan, which is intended to really promote urban development within or <br /> adjacent to existing developments thereby relieving development pressures on Agricultural or <br /> Open designated areas. And finally, the project does, we've demonstrated that project does <br /> remain in compliance with the concurrency standards of the Zoning Code relative to water, <br /> traffic, and civil defense sirens. <br /> 7 <br /> EXHIBIT D <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.