Laserfiche WebLink
WATANABE:This is similar to what we did with the Inaba parcels that were, what was <br />that, 5-acre lots that we said only one dwelling per lot? <br />SIRACUSA:But this is not addressing my concern about that the lot size might be <br />further reduced through rezoning. <br />ALAMEDA:Well, let€s check with the maker of the recommendation. Director Yuen? <br />YUEN:For somebody to, if this rezoning went through and you create 3-acre lots <br />and in the future somebody wants to make 1-acre lots, it would need another rezoning. The only <br />example I can think of, and somebody can chime in if they can think of another one, the only <br />example I can think of where we put a restriction on future rezoning, we were actually only <br />transmitting or carrying on something in the Land Use Commission. I€m thinking of the <br />Newton. Can you think of other examples? <br />DARROW:No. <br />YUEN:No. And the reason, I understand the desire to want to say that€s it; but <br />rezoningisalegislativeprocessthat€sdoneultimatelybytheCountyCouncil.EventheCounty <br />Council, the Charter says that the Council makes decisions by a majority vote. So you take any <br />ordinance that€s passed, like a zoning ordinance, and -. The Council today should not pass <br />something that says that the Council in the future can€t change it. That€s, we don€t know what <br />the conditions are going to be in 20 or 30 years; and, I don€t know, in 30 years everybody may <br />think that 1-acre lots with little farms is the best thing that could ever happen. So I, certainly, <br />you know, I understand the sentiment of wanting to lock up an area. But I am concerned and I, <br />without saying we€d never do it, I wouldn€t recommend a condition like that, nor do I think in, <br />nor do I think that you could really enforce it. Because if you put a condition like that in the <br />ordinance today, the Council can amend the ordinance by majority vote in the future and take <br />that out and say that you can rezone it, and now you can go ahead with your one-acre rezoning at <br />some point in the future. That€s something that we have to live with, that we€re making <br />decisions at one point in time and other people at another point in the time get to make decisions <br />as well. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you, Mr. Director. Commissioner Siracusa, you want to follow up <br />on that? <br />SIRACUSA:No. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Commissioner Watanabe. <br />WATANABE:I tend to agree with Mr. Iwashita on several points, that, yes, eventually <br />this will amount to gentlemen farms and, yes, the family members, even without subdividing, <br />could share in the appreciation that has occurred over the years. But I also like the fact that I <br />think indirectly the motion is saying that in spite of that we don€t want the housing, affordable <br />housing requirements to be diluted. And where I differ from Mr. Iwashita is, I don€t have as <br />much of a problem with the spot zoning or whether it even is spot zoning. I understand it€s right, <br />currently 40 acres. But I don€t see any real concerted effort for large farming and maybe three <br />20EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />