My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022-05-05 Windward Exh C (Item 3 County Council Initiated PL-CCI-2022-001)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2022
>
2022-05-05 Windward Exh C (Item 3 County Council Initiated PL-CCI-2022-001)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2022 2:19:29 PM
Creation date
6/2/2022 2:19:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GALIMBA: So, with some of the issues that were brought up here say, for instance, like what is <br /> a reasonable rate. It's sort of like we say the Planning Director's recommendations that we <br /> should define reasonable. So, do we need to define reasonable before we sent it up? <br /> KAY: Right. <br /> GALIMBA: Like 60 cents, or whatever or 20 cents? <br /> KAY: Right, so this is a situation where in our background and recommendation report are the <br /> Planning Director's recommendation was initially,please further defined what reasonable means. <br /> In response, Councilmember Kimball said, well let's take away that reasonable qualifier and so <br /> the Director agrees with that change and so that's now his kind of new recommendation. And, if <br /> you agree with that as a Commission, you want to send that up deleting that kind of reasonable <br /> language qualifier than that would go up as kind of your recommendation. Then the discussion <br /> we had here about letting kind of the markets set that rate would be what they would discuss up <br /> at Council. <br /> GALIMBA: Okay, so we can send something up and they can further deal with that at Council, <br /> right? <br /> KAY: Yeah, much like a rezone this is just a recommendation that's coming out of this body, <br /> the Commissions. Ultimately the final decision maker on this bill is going to be the County <br /> Council, as it is a code change. <br /> GALIMBA: Okay. <br /> KIMBALL: And if I may Chair. The recommendations that memo that was sent to you folks <br /> from my office is an official document and an official part of the records so as you deliberate you <br /> are able to reference it as, we approve the proposed amendment in such and such a memo. So, it <br /> is an official document that way and it will go through. So, it comes back to the Planning <br /> Committee at the Council, so it will go through the Committee hearing we can continue to <br /> massage it based on any recommendations you have today, and then, if it passes through the <br /> Committee, then it will go through the two hearings that Council as well. <br /> AU: Okay, thank you Commissioner Galimba for that question of process. It clarifies <br /> everything. Do you have any more questions, Commissioner Galimba before I ask my question? <br /> GALIMBA: I'm good, please ask your question Chair Au. <br /> AU: Okay, so I have one question for Noel and Heather. I don't know if he can answer this <br /> question or I'm sure you can, but I don't even know how much detail. What are the <br /> conversations, or what is the engagement with HELCO through this whole process? We're <br /> talking about costs, there's questions about cost, questions about you know whether this is good <br /> for the environment. What kind of engagements have you had up to this point and I'm sure <br /> they're pretty extensive and if you can or want to share with HELCO? <br /> 24 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.