My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PD BACKGROUND REPORT (PL-SLU-2022-004 & PL-REZ-2022-019)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
*Background/Recommendation Reports (June 2020-Sept 2022)
>
2022
>
2022-06-16 Leeward (CANCELLED DUE TO LACK OF QUORUM)
>
Item #4 Amy Hagen-Cowell Trust (PL-REZ-2022-000019)
>
PD BACKGROUND REPORT (PL-SLU-2022-004 & PL-REZ-2022-019)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2022 10:34:14 AM
Creation date
6/7/2022 10:42:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
important for understanding historic habitation and animal <br /> husbandry activity in the area." Based on the above, the AIS <br /> concluded that the proposed development "will have no effect on <br /> the historic properties." It did add that an Archaeological Monitoring <br /> Plan (AMP) would be prepared and implemented in conjunction <br /> with any land disturbance activity. <br /> In a letter, dated April 20, 2021, the State Historic Preservation <br /> Division (SHPD) approved the AIS. (Appendix B) SHPD also <br /> approved the AMP in its letter, dated June 24, 2021. (Appendix C) <br /> G. Valued Cultural Resources <br /> The recent Hawaii State Supreme Court's "PASH" and "Ka Pa'akai <br /> 0 Ka'Aina"decisions require decision-makers to consider a <br /> project's impact to native Hawaiian gathering and fishing rights. <br /> Specifically, there must be a discussion of the cultural, historical, <br /> and natural resources and associated traditional and customary <br /> practices of this site and the impact of this project to these <br /> resources and practices. <br /> In this situation, the subject site is not adjacent and/or proximate to <br /> the shoreline. As such, fishing and coastal access is not an issue. <br /> Furthermore, as noted in the floral and faunal analysis, there are no <br /> known rare or endangered plants or animal life. Since owning the <br /> site for over 20+ years, the applicant has not observed any native <br /> Hawaiians gathering plants within or proximate to the subject site. <br /> As such, it would appear very unlikely that the site would serve <br /> such purpose today and/or in the recent past. <br /> Nonetheless, if legitimate claims are made, the applicant will make <br /> the appropriate access accommodations. <br /> Furthermore, the site has been cleared archaeologically, and there <br /> were no known sites on this property that required preservation, In <br /> conjunction with any land disturbance activities, the protocols of the <br /> approved Archaeological Monitoring Plan will be adhered to. Thus, <br /> in the event inadvertent discoveries are made, the protocols <br /> outlined in the AMP will be followed. These include stopping work <br /> and making contacts and determining appropriate courses of action <br /> with the SHPD. <br /> Based on the above, it does not appear that the project would have <br /> any potential adverse impacts relating to native Hawaiian cultural <br /> and historical resources and/or practices. <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.