My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-02-05 TWITHERS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-02-05 TWITHERS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 10:53:49 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 10:53:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LEITHEAD TODD: I fully recognize that the somewhat restrictive applications of the State law <br />on what you can and can’t do on Ag land is very difficult for people who are actually trying to <br />survive and make a living off of their land and off of what they produce. You know, the whole <br />idea that you can sell your fruit at a fruit stand but if you put it in a blender and blend it then is <br />that then processed and, you know, is that salable? But, you know, we’re somewhat constrained <br />by the fact that we have this State law that makes it very difficult for people to actually pursue <br />what I consider legitimate activities related to their agricultural production. <br />YEH: One of the things that I wanted to add on this parking area issue that had been discussed <br />earlier is that if you would, the entrance to that property and where the building is located used to <br />be kind of a merging of cane haul roads; and one of the roads leads to the north and one road <br />leads to the southwest. And what cane haul roads used to do because the mill was north of the <br />property, they used to come down that cane haul road and use that entire area essentially for a <br />turnaround, cause you had these big cane haul trucks. So that whole area has always been kind <br />of a vehicular use area previously for cane haul, and now this parking area. So that’s why we’re <br />kind of trying to emphasize the point that from a drainage issue standpoint that kind of issue <br />from a public health welfare impact standpoint it really is, if anything, better than how it used to <br />be, on that point. And I’m not sure if staff has the plan approval. <br />DARROW: Thank you, Mr. Yeh. The plan approval did have a plan that showed a triple <br />compartment sink as well as a refrigerator as part of the original request, which would have, <br />because they’re serving to the public would have required certification from Department of <br />Health. <br />WOODWARD: All right, so Madam Director, do you have anything to add to what you said as <br />far as they -? <br />LEITHEAD TODD: I just wanted to make sure that, you know, what they had had been <br />covered in the plan approval; and I’m satisfied after looking at the plans that whether they called <br />it a certified kitchen on the plans or not, but looking at the plans it’s clear that it was in fact a <br />certified kitchen that we signed off on plan approval. <br />WOODWARD: All right, very good. <br />IWASHITA: Follow-up, Mr. Chair? <br />WOODWARD: Yes, Commissioner Iwashita. <br />IWASHITA: I’m still not clear whether that plan approval with parking, going back to the <br />parking issue, whether the plan approval in ’94 basically can be said to have approved the <br />existing parking use. <br />DARROW: In the original plan approval they didn’t specify the amount of parking stalls. They <br />just had a general parking area that appeared to meet the requirements of the footprint that was <br />submitted at that time. <br />10 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.