My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-02-05 TWITHERS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-02-05 TWITHERS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 10:53:49 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 10:53:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IWASHITA: And that’s the footprint, less the 500 square feet? <br />DARROW: Correct. <br />WOODWARD: Commissioner Domingo? <br />] <br />DOMINGO: I think Mr. Iwashita in the very beginning when he asked if buildings have been, or <br />part of the buildings have been, permitted is the basic question that we should all be concerned <br />about with regards to any applications that comes before us, whether or not everything so far <br />have been permitted, everything that’s on the ground. <br />With regards to the question of, you know, making reference to the menu here, and that it will be <br />something beyond the scope of what they originally applied for, you know -. A, as far as I can <br />tell, I think if it’s not within that scope what can this Planning Commission do at this time to be <br />able to entertain that factor whether they can provide that which is listed on the menu as shown <br />to us in the document. <br />YEH: I would, and I apologize, but my suggestion would be on that covered area is to, if <br />necessary for that area require them to get a building permit, if it is in fact required by the <br />Building Code, and insert that as a condition. I think that would be probably proper. <br />WOODWARD: I believe with regard to Commissioner Domingo’s question though the Director <br />has stated that she felt that what they had gotten in the previous plan in ’94 would cover what <br />they’re doing. Am I correct in that? <br />LEITHEAD TODD: Well, I think it covers the certified kitchen. Their application now, my <br />understanding, is to include the sale of products not grown on the property. And to -. <br />YEH: Just to be, just to be safe that’s correct. <br />LEITHEAD TODD: And that would include sandwiches and turkey -. You know, I think under <br />that general heading of selling stuff that’s not island made, you know, your turkey, tuna, <br />whatever, your sandwiches, I think that would be included in the sale of products not grown on <br />the property. And it’s consistent with the fact that they have a fruit stand, and that we signed off <br />on a certified kitchen. <br />YEH: Right. And I think my main point on the plan approval issue is to say, hey, you’ve got the <br />structure there and from that perspective it hasn’t changed. <br />DOMINGO: But as I understand the concept of special permitting is what you state specifically <br />on the application is what you will do, that there’d be no deviation from it. If there is any <br />deviation you have to come in for an amendment to it. And that’s the wonderful part about the <br />special permit, because it gives you the control that you need when there is a need for it. So -. <br />YEH: I agree, I agree, Commissioner. <br />11 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.