My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-02-05 TWITHERS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-02-05 TWITHERS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 10:53:49 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 10:53:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WOODWARD: No, in fact, Commissioner Iwashita mentioned that, that his friendship has <br />nothing to do with this matter. So I don’t think he’s planning on recusing himself. <br />DOMINGO: Well, he has been awfully quiet so Iwas wondering why he’s not -. <br />WOODWARD: Well, sometimes he is quiet, you know. No, it’s nothing that is going to affect <br />his vote. So that’s not really an issue, I don’t believe. <br />IWASHITA: Mr. Chair? <br />WOODWARD: Yes, Commissioner Iwashita. <br />IWASHITA: This is not in response to Taka’s comments. I did have a couple of questions. <br />WOODWARD: Okay, go ahead. <br />IWASHITA: I just wanted to clarify, Tom, with regard to your letter of January 25, 2010, there <br />are just a couple of things. The 500-square foot covered dining area, I’m not clear, was that a <br />permit pulled to add that on? <br />YEH: That was an area that I think was added to allow for more ADA accessibility because it <br />starts for the -. <br />IWASHITA: Right, I just -. <br />YEH: But I’m just going to explain some of the background. So I guess the answer is no. But <br />what they did is they actually added a 500-square foot concrete pad there and then they put in a <br />shelter area that people could sit and dine. So, you know, and I’m not sure it required a building <br />permit per se. <br />IWASHITA: Okay. <br />YEH: It’s a covered awning area is what it is, yeah. <br />IWASHITA: Okay. So you’re not, the representation is it may not, a permit would not <br />necessarily be required, had been required to do that? <br />YEH: I, cause it wasn’t a structure at least in terms of the concrete pad. In terms of the awning <br />area, I’m not sure what the answer to that is. <br />IWASHITA: And as far as the drainage study concerns that you expressed in your letter, <br />looking at the response you got from Public Works, it appears that there’s a County Ordinance <br />that may be applicable. Can I get a clarification on that? <br />6 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.