My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-02-05 TWITHERS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-02-05 TWITHERS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 10:53:49 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 10:53:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
designated parking area. And my question is whether or not the parking as it exists today is the <br />same as in that plan, or is close to. <br />DARROW: Well, at this point since 1994, as the applicant’s representative had stated, there has <br />been an expansion of the facility of 500 square feet. So at that -. <br />WOODWARD: Sorry, I’m asking about the parking area. <br />DARROW: Previously it was, when they came in in 1994 it was reviewed under plan approval <br />for that particular project, without the expansion, and including the parking. <br />IWASHITA: Okay, let me try rephrase my question. We have a site plan for the existing <br />parking today. Right. My question is simply whether or not that existing parking area is larger <br />than the parking area approved in the 1994 site plan, just the parking. The other stuff I’m not <br />really asking about now. <br />DARROW: As far as the amount of stalls, I would have to pull out the plan and look at the <br />difference of the amount of stalls that were required under the 1994 plan.As far as the area, I <br />don’t think the area has changed at all. It appears that the area is large enough to accommodate, <br />you know, well more than -. <br />IWASHITA: Okay, thank you. So my impression then, and correct me if I’m wrong, is that the <br />site plan approved in 1994 from the Department’s perspective it was okay to park within that <br />area as -. And so what’s being, what we’re being asked for today as approving the existing use <br />that that, the existing use falls within that existing area. So there’s -? Cause I, what I’m getting <br />from Mr. Yeh is that, you know, basically since there was approval back then we really shouldn’t <br />be reviewing the plan or require another plan approval since there was already a plan approval <br />for parking within that specified area. If that’s true I’m inclined to agree with Mr. Yeh. <br />DARROW: That would be true if there was no expansion of the facility. Whenever there’s an <br />expansion of a facility, they have to come back in for plan approval. <br />IWASHITA: So you’re talking about the 500 square feet? <br />DARROW: Correct. <br />LEITHEAD TODD: Mr. Chairman? <br />WOODWARD: Planning Director. <br />LEITHEAD TODD: I have a couple of questions; and I regret that I’ve been preoccupied with <br />the State Legislature so did not pay as much attention to this as perhaps I should have. In the <br />1994 plan approval I see what we basically approved was a fruit stand that was going to offer <br />exotic fruits and island-made health snacks; and then the health snacks offered were listed, things <br />like poha jam provided by Puukapu Farms, and health cookies and bars. And I guess, you know, <br />8 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.