2003-02-07 tpuaa - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

line. We talk about, ÐShould actual construction of the subject property not commence within three years from the effective date of this ordinance.Ñ WeÓre going to request that it be amended to the Ðeffective date of the Final Plan ApprovalÑ because the conditions later on in the document give the Applicant five years to get Final Plan Approval. Condition I, the change is intended to point out the fact that we can construct and submit the improvements to the County for dedication but we canÓt control the date that they accept it. And so we wouldnÓt want to be held up because, for whatever reason the County Council do not want to accept it. You know, we would by then have finished the construction, submitted the dedication deed to the County; and thatÓs really all that we can control. So we donÓt want to have, you know, for whatever reason, the Certificate of Occupancy held up for that reason. Next condition change proposed is Condition J. This is a condition change that was talked about at the County Council level for the University of the NationsÓ project, and it was in one of our response letters to the agencyÓs comments. Essentially what weÓre doing is deleting references to a proposed storm sewer system which is identified by the Master Plan for Kailua-Kona. We had a discussion with Public Works. And as their comments on this application show, I donÓt think that they are going to be requiring that the retention basins or other criteria that were mentioned in the Master Plan be implemented on this project. So the condition weÓre proposing, as you see the amendment here are, is that which was adopted for the, by the County Council for the University of the NationsÓ project. The other condition amendments that you see are technical amendments just to make the conditions of approval generic so that if we develop units or lots on the project that it would just apply to both, as applicable. So weÓd be happy to answer any questions. I think what, with respect to the Condition No. J, thatÓs why we submitted this exhibit, the tax map showing the flood control areas for the area. What youÓll see is, to the north, youÓll see the floodways, the AE floodways significantly to the north of the property; and then, itÓs not quite shown but just very little bit on the south side of the property, thereÓs another one that comes down and goes into the area by the University of the Nations. So weÓre requesting that the, any of the improvements that were initially mentioned in the Master Plan for the storm sewer system be deleted from the condition as we believe the Departmen not required that. GALDONES:Mr. Lim, could you speak to DarynÓs proposal for the ne regarding the pedestrian and bicycle pathway? LIM:Okay. I guess, you know, IÓll let Brian do that. COOK:Yes, we did not talk about this before. As you look at our proposed layout right now, the boundary adjacent to The Pines, we have five building groups abutting up to The Pines. As stated earlier, these are, there are 16 units in each 20