2003-02-07 tpuaa - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

building. The cover creating this is a seniorsÓ independent living. What weÓre trying to do is keep the grade as flat as we can for the roadway for people walking down the road. So when weÓre developing these pads, we have about a 15-foot wall here in the pad thatÓs level from the parking through the units; and then it drops another 13 foot here, and itÓs level; drops 13 foot, level; and so on. So weÓre going to have to put sidewalls in the property along here because our grade difference from The Pines will be different. This roadway over there right now dead ends right here. IÓm not sure there would be room, you know, we can certainly look into that and see. But our property line, our buildings are laid about, I think, 10 feet from property line, and then thereÓs going to be a wall here. So we can see, work with Engineering, Public Works, to see if it is possible. There is a property, The Pines is right here. These are the rear property walls. There is an open area to the property line. The conversation earlier about having a walkway coming through here, this is, I understand, a private road. The commercial building at The Pines, Bianelli (phonetic) has moved out. And so maybe itÓs their last, so there is no restaurant now, there is no convenience store. Most of the businesses in there now are, most of the commercial use is business now. You know, if they can get The Pines people to cooperate, we have no problem here trying to come in this way. other bike path would be to come down this way. In developing our layout, weÓre trying to keep a nice greenbelt from Hualalai Road to the entry of the project. We envision this to keep this whole wall in here and put some pathways in here. So maybe we can work to try to, if we can acc then The Pines maybe wouldnÓt like the idea of us coming into their private roadway. You know, I donÓt know -. We did meet with, to try to be good neighbors, we did meet with the owners of The Pines about six weeks ago and we gave them just a brief review of what weÓre proposing, trying to do. GALDONES:Thank you. LIM:I guess our position would be that, you know, I think, the Planning Director recognizes that thereÓs probably no statutory requirement to the public, I guess, what amounts to be a public accessway through the project. I think, and especially, you know, weÓve got liability concerns. I think we also have some security concerns for the seniors in the project. They may not want to have people walking in through the project from another development. And I guess maybe thatÓs something th Department can implement as a best efforts clause at the Final P to put it in a rezoning, I think, unless youÓre going to require it, itÓs probably not a good idea. GALDONES:Before I ask the Commissioners for questions, Daryn, could you speak to the changes that were proposed by Mr. Lim? ARAI:Sure. Looking at the what the Applicant submitted, the proposed amendment to conditions of approval, Condition C regarding the Water Supply, we recommend that the condition and its language remain as is, with one modification. And 21