My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-02-07 tpuaa
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-02-07 tpuaa
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 10:55:43 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 10:55:38 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GALDONES:Commissioner Togashi? <br />TOGASHI:Thank you, Mr. Chair. IÓd like to ask for a clarification on <br />Condition H. In the middle of the paragraph, it begins by saying ÐThe revised TIAR shall <br />consider, at a minimum, development currently under construction and recently <br />proposedÈ.Ñ Does the timeframe being spoken of at the, currently under construction <br />and recently proposed, at the time of the revised TIAR which may <br />or is it at the time, effective date of the ordinance? <br />ARAI:Three years hence, for example. The reason being is, yeah, <br />development maybe is under construction now, but say three years hence is completed -. <br />TOGASHI:Right. <br />ARAI:When they do the traffic study at that time itÓs going to have to be <br />based on current counts, which would already take into effect those developments that are <br />in operation. So -. <br />TOGASHI:Okay. So youÓre speaking of three years from the effective date of <br />the ordinance, which would be the development currently being proposed there under <br />construction. ThatÓs what youÓre saying, yeah? ItÓs not now? <br />ARAI:ItÓs not now. That much you can say, itÓs not now. <br />TOGASHI:Okay. I wanted to ask you, also, with regard the standa <br />condition regarding extension in that they basically have, with regard to Condition H, as <br />much as six years to, would that be clearer -? <br />ARAI:Thank you very much for catching that. We would recommend <br />that Condition H be excluded from this time extension, if the Director doesnÓt mind. <br />And if you would allow me, you know, we can make the necessary w <br />exclude Condition H. <br />TOGASHI:I need to ask one more last question, and this is with regard to <br />Condition C. For the benefit of Commissioners who are not from <br />Condition C speaks of Welo Street, Hoene Place and the Aloha Kona reservoir. Can you <br />point these out? I have the map here but I donÓt see a Hoene Place nor do I see a Welo <br />Street. <br />ARAI:Why donÓt I turn it over to the Department of Water Supply. <br />AHUNA:We have a reservoir in the Kailua View Estates Subdivision that <br />would be servicing the project. And itÓs approximately, thereÓs no street names here, but <br />itÓs in Kailua View Estates anyway, in that line; and thereÓs two reservoirs there. And the <br />booster pump youÓre talking about is down in the Aloha Kona Subdivision. <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.