My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-02-17 Leeward Exh A - KIC
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2011
>
2011-02-17 Leeward Exh A - KIC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:02:17 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:02:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GIFFIN: I apologize. <br />BOCKUS: No, no apology needed, thank you. I would assume that Item 3(b) would be applicable <br />in my case. My Parcel No. is, Tax Map Key is 7-8-7: Parcel 3, which is not mentioned in here; but <br />I would like to have it put on the record that the buffer zone would include my property also, and -. <br />GIFFIN: The specific TMK? <br />BOCKUS: You are right – 7-8-7: Parcel 3. <br />GIFFIN: Hang on just a minute. Jeff, is that something that we should do? <br />DARROW: Yeah, we are going to take a moment to confirm the location of his property. Thank <br />you. <br />GIFFIN: Okay. <br />LEITHEAD TODD: Madam Chair? <br />GIFFIN: Ms. Director. <br />LEITHEAD TODD: Madam Chair, my recollection on this item is that the information which talks <br />about the lots adjacent to Ihilani Place, which have a common property line with the project site as <br />well as the Pu‘uloa Subdivision lots, included this specific TMK that we are referring to. Because <br />it’s not just his property, and rather than having to address this and list every TMK, and particularly <br />because sometimes if somewhere in the future somebody subdivides and additional TMK numbers <br />are assigned to lots mauka of this, then it would have an issue of some of them not matching up. <br />But this Condition (b) was specifically put in to protect the properties that were just mauka and <br />adjacent to this project. <br />GIFFIN: Thank you, Director. Mr. Bockus. <br />BOCKUS: Yes, question: What would be the width of this buffer zone? Would it be the 200-foot <br />wide or would it be – in Section (m) there is mention of 50-foot wide -? <br />LEITHEAD TODD: No, the one that applies to your property is the 200-foot wide. <br />BOCKUS: Thank you. <br />GIFFIN: Any other questions? Commissioners, any questions of the testifiers? Hearing none, will <br />the three of you please step back? I’m going to ask Mr. Lim and the applicant to come forward <br />again. And thank you very much for coming in this morning. <br />I know that you heard all of the concerns that were raised, in particular the ones by Mr. Ward. Mr. <br />Lim, do you want to address those concerns? <br />LIM: Thank you. The comments relating to the public access, the details and the standard criteria <br />for the access that Mr. Ward was mentioning, some of which are the code of federal regulations <br />standards that are upcoming, and things like that, I think, will be all covered by the language in <br />7 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.