Laserfiche WebLink
omitted; so we are proposing to amend the condition from three, what the applicant is applying for, <br />from three to five years to accommodate this omission. <br />GIFFIN: Okay, so, Allen, if I’m not mistaken, which condition are you speaking of specifically? <br />SALAVEA: That would be Condition B, Madam Chair. <br />GIFFIN: E. <br />SALAVEA: B as in boy. <br />GIFFIN: Oh, B as in boy. Thank you. Hang on. <br />SALAVEA: So basically, if you look under Condition B, Madam Chair, the second sentence, <br />instead of the stricken out “five,” it would remain and then -. <br />GIFFIN: Strike out “three.” <br />SALAVEA: Yeah. <br />GIFFIN: Okay. <br />SALAVEA: And the change would be only applicable to the recommendation. <br />GIFFIN: Allen, what do you mean by that, please?I’m sorry. <br />SALAVEA: So the changes would be made to the recommendation report, as well as the <br />accompanying draft bill that would be forwarded up to the Council. <br />GIFFIN: Oh, the ordinance, uh ha, okay, I get it. Commissioners, any other questions of Allen? <br />None? Allen, I have a question, just real easy. In the background report, on Page 2, under Reasons <br />for the Request, there was some sort of I guess change of ownership or something, there was a <br />change; so now the structure is going to be a pavilion instead of this restaurant thing that was going <br />to happen. <br />SALAVEA: That is correct, Madam Chair. <br />GIFFIN: Could you explain that further? How did that come about? <br />SALAVEA: As described in the application, the original plans were developed by the original <br />applicant, which was Twigg, and as this was purchased and come under ownership by Puaanui <br />Partnership, the economy and other factors that contributed to the delay in the restaurant project <br />moving forward, which also included renovations to the bed and breakfast and try and secure a <br />Planned Unit Development permit, allowed the current applicants to review what would best serve <br />both their venture as well as the surrounding community. And what they’ve found is that this <br />would be best suited to allow the community access to the property, as well as be commercially <br />viable. And I think maybe you can ask that question of the applicant to expand even further; but <br />that’s what was included in the application. <br />3 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />