My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-02-19 TCROWN
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2009
>
2009-02-19 TCROWN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:05:35 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:05:34 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Wireless tower, it’s the same for our entire industry. And then, so we try to plan for the height in <br />order to do that. And I see sometimes that the Commission may be resistant to approve tall <br />towers, but the whole point is to limit the amount of towers that we have around our island. And <br />if this application does not get approved, we will probably have to have another cell tower <br />somewhere else in, you know, to cover the area that this tower could cover. And I just wanted to <br />make that clear; I’m sure you knew that already, but I wanted to reiterate.Also how important it <br />is that we have cell phone communication for public safety and also to provide voice and data <br />services, too; it’s so important to our economy. And that’s all I have to say. Thanks. <br />WATANABE: Thank you. Fellow Commissioners, do we have any questions of Ms. <br />Mettler? Seeing none, then, Eric, name and address, please. <br />SCHATZ: Good afternoon. Eric Schatz, representing Coral Wireless dba Mobi PCS. <br />Address is 1200 Bishop, excuse me, 733 Bishop Street, Suite 1200, Honolulu. I’m here <br />representing Mobi PCS in support of this application to replace the 80-foot wooden monopole, <br />guyed pole, with a 120-foot steel pole. Mobi PCS began providing service on the Big Island just <br />over a year ago. We do not currently provide service to this particular area, and we would like to <br />do so. Without the increase in height and the additional structural support a steel pole will offer, <br />we are going to be forced to build another pole somewhere else in order to provide this coverage. <br />We greatly prefer to locate on an existing structure or an improved structure, if we could, rather <br />than building one of our own. And that’s all my testimony. Thank you. <br />WATANABE: Thank you. Fellow Commissioners, any questions? <br />DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman? <br />WATANABE: Yes. <br />DOMINGO: It’s obvious then that both of you, the companies that you represent will be <br />co-locating on this pole, if it’s granted the necessary height. <br />SCHATZ: Verizon Wireless is currently on the pole, and would like the increased <br />height to add services, I believe; I don’t want to speak for Verizon. Mobi PCS is not on the pole, <br />but would like to locate there. <br />DOMINGO: Okay. <br />WATANABE: Any further questions? Okay. Thank you for your testimony. You both <br />may be seated. I believe I left off with you, Mr. Woodward. <br />WOODWARD: Yeah, I would like to move in the matter of Special Permit No. 1191, that <br />we approve the amendment to allow the replacement of the existing 80-foot monopole with a <br />120-foot steel monopole. And I believe there were some additions, when we last met, to some of <br />the conditions; that essentially this 120-foot steel monopole will not have any guy wires, and so <br />Condition No. 6 can be deleted. <br />IWASHITA: Mr. Chair, point of procedure. <br />EXHIBIT B <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.