2003-02-21 tkamuela - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

GALDONES:Please do. KUBOTA:Thank you. On page 2 of the IntervenorÓs exceptions, Fin Fact, the first item, paragraph No. 20, refers to the property ownership of the McCulloughÓs property and it makes a correction on the Hearing OfficerÓs page 5, I think it is. On page 5 of the Hearing OfficerÓs paragraph 20, he refers to the property, subject property, in Kauakea Subdivision owned by Artie McCullough. And my understanding is that it is owned by Mr. David McCullough; and that change ought to be reflected. Okay? Going down further on paragraph 43 of the IntervenorÓs exception, it refers to page 9 of the Hearing OfficerÓs submittal and it refers to No. 43, paragraph 43, Declaration of Covenants. And in the last sentence, the IntervenorÓs exhibit should be changed from 42 to 5. Then down further, on the same page, No. 44, again, the same correction is reflected in the exceptions submitted by the Intervenor. So that IntervenorÓs Exhibit 42 should be changed to Exhibit 5. Okay? GALDONES:Ms. Kubota, that would be on paragraph 20, paragraph 43 and paragraph 44? Was there another one -? KUBOTA:Yes. GALDONES:Or did I miss? KUBOTANo, no. Those are ones that I would like to have reflected in the final document. GALDONES:Okay. There is an amendment to the motion. Is there a MCCALL:Second. GALDONES:Okay. Motion by Commissioner Kubota and seconded by Commissioner McCall that the exceptions that were presented will However, the record will show that the subject property is owned by Mr. David McCullough and not by Mr. Artie McCullough, as appeared in paragraph 20, and that in paragraph 43, Exhibit 42 will be corrected to reflect Exhibit 5. And in paragraph 44, likewise, the change will be from Exhibit 42 to Exhibit 5 TORIGOE:Excuse me, Mr. Chair? GALDONES:Mr. Torigoe? 23