My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-02-21 tkamuela
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-02-21 tkamuela
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:07:39 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:07:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TORIGOE:Just a semantic clarification. You were talking about that the <br />exceptions would not be considered. I think, would the meaning <br />like that the exceptions have been considered and theyÓre being rejected, except as stated <br />by the Commissioner? <br />GALDONES:Oh, that is the intent of the motion. <br />KUBOTA:Correct. Thank you, thank you. Better said. Do I need to give a <br />reason for them? The ones that were, that are being reflected are, those are factual <br />information, I guess, you might call it. Objective versus subjective. <br />TORIGOE:Okay. So you now have a motion, and you have an amendme <br />the motion, and a second to the amendment. So if you can ask if <br />then the motion will be amended; and then go on back to the main <br />GALDONES:Okay. Thank you. Commissioners, you have heard the <br />amendment to the motion. Are there any objections? Maybe I should -. All those in <br />favor of the amendment to the motion, signify by saying aye. <br />COMMISSIONERS:Aye. <br />GALDONES:Opposed? Likewise. Okay. So the main motion has been <br />amended to incorporate the motion, the amendment that was made b <br />Kubota. Okay. I hope I donÓt have to repeat all of that. I might just butcher the whole <br />thing. But, anyway, what the motion that we are acting on, Commissioners, is that we are <br />accepting the Findings, and the Conclusion of Law, and Recommendation of the Hearing <br />Officer and that the exceptions that were presented as stated by our Corporation Counsel, <br />how we are dealing with the exceptions, that is the motion that we are dealing on. Are <br />there any other discussions? Bear with me. Commissioner Kubota? <br />KUBOTA:I think youÓre doing a marvelous job. <br />GALDONES:Commissioners, any further discussion on the motion? Hearing <br />none, Alice? <br />KAWAHA:Commissioner Kubota? <br />KUBOTA:Aye. <br />KAWAHA:Commissioner McCall? <br />MCCALL:Aye. <br />KAWAHA:Commissioner Fujikawa? <br />FUJIKAWA:Aye. <br />24 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.