My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-02-24 TKona_REZ05026
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-02-24 TKona_REZ05026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:37:40 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:37:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HAYASHI:I wasnt quite sure I couldnt find a place in my-. <br />GRAHAM:I think she was saying the TIAR at the time when you wrote up this report <br />maybe it wasnt in but it is in now, it has been in. <br />MARISSA:It is page 4 of your recommendation the paragraph at the top, the last <br />sentence. <br />HAYASHI:Basically what-. The recommendation was done and sent out to the <br />parties as well as the Commissioners prior to receipt of the amended TIAR. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. <br />HAYASHI:So on that basis then we can make that change before its forwarded to the <br />CountyCouncil. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. <br />MARISSA:Okaythankyou.Aswelltheparagraphbelowshowthearchaeological <br />inventory survey dated 1992. There were 2 revisions, 1996 and 1998 the references are in our <br />appendix. The next item 9 just below that it says according to the landowner on and on, there are <br />no existence of any known valued cultural, historical or native resources and we just wanted to <br />reconfirm that we do acknowledge there are valued cultural, historical and native resources on <br />the property as evidenced by our archaeological inventory survey. So we didnt want any <br />confusion on that part. Condition M regarding restrictive covenants. Ric Wheelock can you <br />address that? <br />WHEELOCK:Yes, Condition M as contained in the recommended conditions of <br />rezoning there is a portion of the southern boundary towards the makai end of the project that is <br />within the floodway designated area. This condition states there should be no construction of <br />dwellings and related improvements in that flood area. Thats fine. It goes on to state the <br />restrictive covenants in the deeds of all lots shall give notice to the terms of this rezoning <br />condition. Wed like to request the commission consider changing that to the lots that contain <br />the flood zone. We dont know what effect having that restrictive covenant in lots that dont <br />have the flood zone on them would have since they cant do anything about others property. <br />GRAHAM:Mr. Yuen would you have any comment on that? <br />YUEN:Thats fine. Im not sure youre looking at the most-. Youre not, the <br />yellow is the most recent though and not the goldenrod. That sentence is still in the yellow one <br />though. That, thats fine thats not right to say that it should be all lots. <br />WHEELOCK:Thank you. <br />MARISSA:And I just have one last item. <br />EXHIBIT E <br />15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.