My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-02-24 TKona_REZ05026
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-02-24 TKona_REZ05026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:37:40 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:37:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GRAHAM:Sure. <br />MARISSA:Condition Q. The first sentence says should any remains of historic sites. <br />We would like to request a language change to should any unidentified remains or undiscovered <br />remains cause our archaeological reports clearly state there are remains. So we just wanted it to <br />clarify unidentified or undiscovered if thats possible. And thats my last request. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you is that also okay with you Mr. Yuen. <br />YUEN:Yes. <br />GRAHAM:Mr. Carr? <br />CARR:Thank you Chairman Graham. I have a couple of clarification comments <br />aswellontheyellowamendmentonConditionI,whichreadsprovideconcretecurb,guttersand <br />sidewalks in the RM-3.5 zoned area. No, that ones okay, that ones okay. Condition H. The <br />previous condition. Provide roadway connections to adjoining parcels meeting with the approval <br />of the Planning Director in consultation with the Department of Public Works. All roadways <br />shall be constructed to dedicable standards, be open to public traffic and be dedicated to the <br />County upon request at no cost to the County. We, our intent is to, and its picked up in <br />Condition I that we will do County dedicable standards with curb, concrete curb gutters and <br />sidewalks within the right-of-way adjacent to the RM 3.5 zone at which it terminates at that first <br />north-south connection. Thereafter it is our intent to have agricultural standard roadways to this <br />mauka up above. <br />GRAHAM:So then the question perhaps for the Planning Director is if you do have <br />agricultural standard roads at what (inaudible) conform to this condition. Is that correct? <br />CARR:Correct. If-. <br />GRAHAM:Mr. Yuen. <br />YUEN:Let me hear Ki Emlers comments on this. <br />EMLER:Yes on Condition H we did make the recommendation and its based on <br />the standards of the subdivision code. So if the Planning Director and the Planning Commission <br />prefer to make the condition so that it did not reflect the subdivision code and this could be <br />deferred to subdivision code later then it would be up to the discretion of the Planning Director <br />and not the County Council. So what we did was we reflected what the requirements are in the <br />subdivision code to provide dedicable roadways for serving lots of less than 3 acres. 3 acres and <br />above is what the Ag standard roadway standard is for. <br />YUEN:Yeah thats correct. <br />EXHIBIT E <br />16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.