My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-03-02 TBILLS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-03-02 TBILLS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:41:11 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:41:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the regional road network to mitigate the problem, or you wait until improvements have <br />been made that take away the Level of Service deficiency. <br />SIRACUSA:I -? <br />YUEN:Yes? Why dont we take questions. We can take questions as I go <br />along. You have a question? <br />SIRACUSA:Okay. Its my impression that when youre talking about roads <br />here youre only talking about major arterials, County and State Highways, and not <br />smaller roads which may be County-owned but would go into say cul-de-sac <br />subdivisions. Is that a correct assessment? <br />YUEN:No. As far as the regional roads, yes. It would only be the arterial <br />roads,themainhighways.Itsaysarterialandcollectorroads.Butyouwouldstill,ifyou <br />had a project on a small street that could generate 100 or more trips per day (sic), this <br />would say you should do a traffic study; and if that would congest that road, then you <br />would do the local mitigation for that. But you wouldnt have somebody go fix, well, <br />you can make them fix the road that theyre on as part of the local mitigation. <br />SIRACUSA:Im thinking in terms of roads, obviously Im thinking of roads <br />where I live, single lane dirt road; and 100 trips per a day is ridiculous. I mean when five <br />new subdivisions were approved, you know, 20 cars made a humongous difference. And <br />so it seems that youre not taking scale into consideration here, that in some areas 100 <br />trips may be a perfectly reasonable way of gauging this. But in other areas, 50 or even 20 <br />trips would be a tremendous impact. And there doesnt seem to be a lot of flexibility. <br />And when I was reading through here, and you talked about things being vague. To me, <br />it was that they were allowing for some flexibility because some of these situations are so <br />different from one community and one area to another. And how do we walk that thin <br />line of balancing, you know, being really specific and on allowing enough variation to <br />allow for different regions and their own specific layouts and problems? <br />YUEN:None of these bills is intended to answer all of the issues that may <br />come up during a rezoning request. So, for example, in a situation you gave where if <br />somebody is applying for a rezoning on say a one-lane road that is just not suitable for <br />that level of development, then regardless of whether you have a concurrency ordinance <br />or not, the right response is to deny the rezoning because the road is not adequate to serve <br />the proposed project. The reason to have a cutoff for doing the traffic report is that the <br />traffic report studies congestion. The TIAR may refer to the type of road thats in front <br />of the project, but the TIAR only tells you about congestion. The TIAR doesnt tell you, <br />you know, theres a 40-foot drop off the shoulder. Okay? So it doesnt solve those kinds <br />of issues. And those things are still out there; and you have to use common sense and <br />judgment in analyzing any rezoning. This only deals with the question of traffic <br />congestion and how it may affect the local and the regional road networks. <br />4EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.