My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-03-02 TBILLS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-03-02 TBILLS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:41:11 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:41:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GRAHAM:Chris, let me just give you a little, an overall pitch or read on this, <br />and you tell me if it sounds right, like Im thinking of it right. Like this is an ordinance <br />which the County Council would presumably pass but the County Council is also the <br />body that passes the rezonings. So the County Council is kind of telling itself I cant pass <br />rezonings in certain situations if I pass this law. But they could just as well just not pass <br />it under certain situations anyway. <br />YUEN:Right. And that goes to a question of whether you adopt <br />something like this as an ordinance or whether you adopt something like this as a <br />guideline that you use in evaluating rezonings. And in discussing this, in the background, <br />for example, I try to point out that, recognizing that theres a highway problem in Kona, <br />for several years the rezonings, the really larger rezonings have typically involved road <br />conditions or have had affordable housing objectives. And this is a policy thats <br />underlying some of the decisions and the recommendations that weve made without it <br />actuallybeinganordinance.SotheCouncil,yes,theycouldadoptthesethingsasa <br />policy. Theres some desire of the Council Members to adopt an ordinance that has the <br />effect of limiting their freedom of action, the freedom of action of the Council in granting <br />rezonings. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you. <br />DOMINGO:This would apply to all rezonings, or is it limited to size in number <br />of acres, or -? <br />YUEN:Well, the Councils Bill 318 would apply to all. The Directors <br />revisions would kick in the TIAR, the study requirement only for larger projects, this 100 <br />vehicles per day (sic) threshold which for a single family residential project it works out <br />to about 150, to a project with 150 homes or lots, multi-family would be 225. So it <br />would only kick in for what is to us a larger scale of project, not the kind that you see <br />every day, every application. <br />DOMINGO:But the Councils version of the bill would involve every <br />application for rezoning? <br />YUEN:Yes, thats what it says. <br />DOMINGO:And thats my fear because were precluding those rezonings of a, <br />you know, mom and pop who has a fairly good sized lot and they would like to subdivide <br />it or rezone it and subdivide it for their children. If this precludes it, then its going to be <br />hard. And what will happen is theyll go to the Council and complain to the Council, and <br />then youll have the pressure to do something, where, in fact, it was of their own <br />ordinance that precludes them from considering that rezoning application. I can see and <br />appreciate the concern that the Council has in regards to, for the reason in coming up <br />with such a major -, although there are some reservations on my part, and I see from <br />yours. <br />5EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.