My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-03-05 thester
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-03-05 thester
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:48:01 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:47:58 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SPRINGER:Norman, IÓm looking at Exhibit K and the response to it; and thatÓs from <br />the Na Ala Hele Trails and Access System. IÓm just wondering whether that trail appears on the <br />map, the map on the left, if possible. <br />HAYASHI:The, unfortunately, we didnÓt follow up on the request with the Na Ala <br />Hele Group. So, at this point in time, we donÓt know where the trail is located. I think thatÓs <br />something that the group or DLNR is still researching. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Chair? <br />FUJIKAWA:Go ahead, Springer. <br />SPRINGER:IÓm just, my concern is that it is mentioned in the background material and <br />we donÓt see any reference to it in the conditions. So IÓm wondering how we should treat that. <br />FUJIKAWA:Any questions, Commissioners, besides going on this trail matter with <br />Commissioner Springer? You have a question, too, McCall? <br />MCCALL:Yeah, maybe just a clarification. WeÓd probably have someone in the <br />audience who could probably tell us where the trail probably is. I think, John, you might, or -. <br />IÓm assuming itÓs probably the old road. But I did have one other question. You mentioned in J <br />of the conditions that the archaeological inventory is covered. IÓm not sure if it is under your <br />reading. IÓd like your opinion cause you have, the last sentence of J says that, you know, the first <br />talks about the archaeological inventory survey and then the last sentence says, ÐIn lieu thereof <br />the applicant can satisfy this condition with a no-effect letter from DLNR.Ñ So from my <br />understanding, we have the no-effect letter so -. Am I misreading this or -? <br />HAYASHI:We donÓt have a no-effect letter. Basically, the letter that was just <br />distributed to you indicated that they reviewed it and their proposal is acceptable; however, they <br />would need to still submit an archaeological inventory to DLNR for acceptance; and that s the <br />proposed condition, the first portion of that condition. So by doing that at a subsequent date, <br />then they would comply with that particular condition. <br />MCCALL:Okay, I understand. Thank you. <br />HAYASHI:And in response to Commissioner SpringerÓs comment regarding the <br />trails, we do have a proposed Condition L that talks about the trail. Without specifically <br />mentioning the trail that Na Ala Hele Program had indicated, we just said that any trails they <br />should get approval from DLNR. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. <br />FUJIKAWA:Any other questions? Commissioner Kubota? <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.