Laserfiche WebLink
PARKINSON: My name is Jackie Parkinson. I live at 16-465 Laniuma in Keaau. But I’m here <br />today representing the Hawaii Island Board of Realtors; and we are currently located at <br />26 Waianuenue, right next to Koehnens. <br />I’d like to, I’ve submitted some written testimony, it’s rather lengthy.I’m not going to go into <br />all the issues on the written testimony. But we have been asked, the Hawaii Island Board of <br />Realtors has been asked to become a lead partner in some portions of the proposed plan, as well <br />as other kinds of partnerships. So we are very much in support of smart growth and excited <br />about the plan. But we also are protectors, our mission is to protect private property rights. And <br />we are concerned that there are some issues here that are impacting the property rights without <br />enough thought being put into some of the issues. <br />One of the issues that isn’t in my written testimony that I would like to point out is that - I’ve <br />discussed just a tiny bit with some of the plan creators - is that there’s not enough thought about <br />the impact of the tsunami rebuilding requirements from FEMA in the inundation zone, in <br />incorporating that into the plan. If you’re going to have a pedestrian-oriented Downtown, I think <br />that also needs to be addressed. I think we need a little bit more time on that. The ordinance <br />itself is our primary concern, that we aren’t there, the design criteria isn’t developed enough yet <br />to really create an ordinance. And perhaps some of these design elements are better done outside <br />of an ordinance and in a design review of some sort. I also want to point out in our testimony, it <br />is pointed out a little bit, some of the incongruence between the plan, including the ordinance. <br />And that is the reduction and use and elimination of some, like rest homes or residen -, what <br />would be otherwise considered acceptable and mixed use in a residential/commercial <br />community. So I’m grateful to hear that you’re postponing. I’m not sure I’ll be here in May so I <br />just wanted to make sure that we could point out some of our concerns. <br />The other is the cost that some of these, that ordinance would create for redevelopment of <br />Downtown, which is something all of us are, and I think all of us are on the same page, we all <br />want Hilo to be a wonderful place for people to come and shop and visit and live as well. I think <br />another thing pointed out here that we need to revisit is the zero lot line and the impact that it has <br />not only on future development but on our current businesses who use the sidewalks or their little <br />foyer for marketing and encouraging visitors. So I thank you. I hope you will take some time to <br />read through this rather lengthy written testimony we provided; and I’m happy to answer any <br />questions you may have. <br />WOODWARD: All right, thank you. Do we have any questions for Ms. Parkinson? <br />Commissioner Domingo? <br />DOMINGO: No, no, no. <br />WOODWARD: No, okay, I was just anticipating. Okay, I always look there. Okay, <br />Mr. Melrose, you’ve already been sworn in, sworn at, and given your name a couple of times, so <br />you may just begin. <br />MELROSE: Thanks. I’m going to wear the Downtown Improvement Association’s hat in this <br />conversation; and I chair the Planning and Government Affairs Committee of the DIA. Our <br />2 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />