Laserfiche WebLink
th <br />I'm sorry, the March 4 response to that, this week's response -. <br />YUEN:Yeah. <br />TSUKAZAKI:Contains a statement from our side indicating we do not believe <br />that that left hand storage lane is warranted. <br />YUEN:Yes, I see that. As far as the Department's comments on the traffic <br />improvements, we'll wait to the end of public testimony to give <br />that. <br />I do want to comment on why we would oppose a change to G, the f <br />improvements within the flood zones. Chapter 27 is the flood co <br />Hawai`i County. It applies not just at the, it applies to properties that are already zoned. <br />It applies at the building permit stage, it applies at the subdivision stage. It's taken from a <br />national law. It's basically a copy of a standard national law that the County has to put in <br />place in order to qualify for flood insurance. It's tied in with, there's a national, and state <br />approach to this. The law itself is written to apply to communities that, where there's <br />already zoning in place, and in other words, it applies to lots that are already zoned <br />residential or already zoned commercial. And so the approach taken by the federal <br />government is that you restrict, you don't prohibit building on the lots. You simply, you <br />require that the lots be, that if construction occurs on the property, that it be built up from <br />the floodway, like on stilts, for example, with breakaway construction allowed. So our, if <br />you take Chapter 27, if you were in an existing commercial zone, <br />have -, we have commercial zones that are in floodways. What it does then is say that <br />new construction has to be built up. <br />The reason for the federal government taking this approach, one of the reasons, is that <br />you're dealing with properties that already had land use entitlements, they already -, <br />they're zoned to do certain things. And then you get into these constitutional taking <br />issues, if you then pass a law that says you can't build in the floodway anymore -. <br />As a matter of philosophy, though, if we're talking about taking a piece of property that <br />has one zoning and moving to a zoning that allows greater construction, greater use, our <br />approach is that, to not allow construction in the floodway. Rather than rezone this <br />property and allow them to build commercial buildings in the floodway -, that it could be <br />elevated above the floodway is better. Because you have the control at the zoning stage <br />to restrict construction within the flood zones as a tradeoff for allowing greater <br />development outside the flood zones. So that's the reason for taking this approach and <br />not just simply saying that we should follow Chapter 27 and allow anything that can be <br />built pursuant to Chapter 27 to be put in the floodway. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Tsukazaki. <br />15 <br /> <br />