My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-03-07 THOKUKANO1
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-03-07 THOKUKANO1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:52:42 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:52:38 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TSUKAZAKI:Again, we believe that Chapter 27, as the Planning Director <br />indicated, you know, is really a very comprehensive approach taken by the federal <br />government, and it right now is, provides a clear legal basis for determinations to be <br />made as to what can be allowed within certain flood zones and what design requirements <br />may apply for certain structures within subzones. I'm not, you know, sure at this point <br />that, I mean I understand what the Planning Director was just explaining as to be some <br />kind of policy or objective here, I'm just not sure that there's any legal basis for it. <br />YUEN:Well, there certainly is a legal basis not to rezone property within a <br />flood zone for a higher use. The County can make that decision. <br />our recommendation to the Planning Commission and the Council would be not to rezone <br />on property within the flood zone. If you do, if you rezone it as part of a larger zoning to <br />restrict the construction that then occurs within the flood zone. Chapter 27 was written to <br />apply to property that was already zoned so that people already have an entitlement to use <br />that area for building. So in that situation, you have the allowance for building and <br />people build up. But as a matter of what we should be doing, we should be trying to keep <br />people from putting expensive structures in the flood zones. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you, Mr. Yuen. Commissioner Giffin. <br />GIFFIN:Madam Chair, I have a question of Mr. Tsukazaki. Listeni <br />both comments from Mr. Yuen and from you, I'm inclined to agree <br />I just have a question of you, Mr. Tsukazaki. Hearing what the Director has said, are you <br />then amenable to the condition as proposed, or are you still insisting on an amendment? <br />TSUKAZAKI:No. If -, I think we've proposed language that we think is more <br />appropriate. If the Planning Commission chooses not to adopt it, we would agree to <br />comply with whatever conditions the Commission and the County Council should -. <br />GIFFIN:Thank you. <br />TSUKAZAKI:Impose. <br />GIFFIN:Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you, Commissioner Giffin. Other Members of the <br />Commission, any questions or comments to the Applicant or the Director? At this time, <br />I'd like to go through the list of public testifiers, starting with Mr. Charles Coup and <br />followed by Lunakanawai Hauanio. <br />GIFFIN:Madam Chair, may I ask how many public testifiers have signed <br />up? <br />SPRINGER:We have seven at this time, and we can bring more chairs to the <br />table. <br />16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.