My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-03-09 Tplanning_director
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-03-09 Tplanning_director
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:57:25 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:57:17 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MCCALL:Mr. Chairman? <br />YUEN:Well, -. <br />ALAMEDA:Hold on, please. Commissioner McCall? <br />MCCALL:I can be very quick, let me just say one thing. As far as I understand these <br />are changes to portions of the ordinance, this is not the entire subdivision ordinance. And were <br />not saying that these things are not going to be in the final approval; were just saying its not <br />going to be in the preliminary. Is that correct? <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Director? <br />YUEN:Astotheinformationonthefinalplat,thereasonwemadethosechanges <br />are that there are final plats that are also subject to being challenged because of the same <br />technical lack of information. There are things in this list of things on 23-69 that are not <br />typically done. Many of them involve technical surveying terms that are not commonly used. <br />Its not a point of, and Id like to, you know, I mean, if were serious about, I have to -. The <br />Commission does not deal with subdivisions, the Department deals with subdivisions. If you <br />want I can go through this. But to say that you want to have this stuff on the final plat and that it <br />should be subject to being invalidated later if its not on it is, I would like to, you know, if you <br />say that, then I have go through it point by point and say really do you want to invalidate a final <br />subdivision plat because it does not, do you want to have it open to being invalidated later by, <br />say, a third party who may be the neighbor of the subdivision because it does not have this <br />information? That is what is at stake here. Its not a question of whether the roads get put in or <br />whether the subdivision happens or not. Its really a question of what stage can it be challenged <br />by an outside party? <br />TORIGOE:Can I ask -? <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Torigoe? <br />TORIGOE:Yeah. Im just wondering, with respect to that section that Commissioner <br />, <br />Graham is talking about on 23-73, that lastThedirectors submission of the final plat to other <br />, <br />reviewers constitutes acceptance of the contents is that meaning to be a grandfathering thing or <br />is that meant to be a prospective thing also? <br />YUEN:Well, it is a grandfathering because of the -. There is a clause here, the <br />Section 10 says This ordinance shall take effect upon its approval, and shall apply to all <br />subdivision applications, tentative subdivision approvals, and final subdivision approvals before <br />and after its effective date. And you have to understand the significance final subdivision <br />approval is the last stage. And after final subdivision approval, people can go out and sell the <br />lots. There isnt any handle after final subdivision approval. So, yes, it is meant to, it is, that last <br />sentence 10 makes it apply to existing applications and the final approvals that have been given <br />which may technically be at some risk because of the court decision. <br />20EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.