My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-03-16 TBILLS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-03-16 TBILLS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:59:52 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:59:49 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DOMINGO:I somehow tend to agree with my colleague. If we do go a negative vote <br />on the rest of the bills and a positive action on Bill 318, if we send it up without any <br />recommendations on the other bills with the reason why were not acting on it because of our <br />reservations in the part of, as explained to the Commission, if we would stress that and elaborate <br />on that, then the Council can then take whatever steps they need to take. Because Im sure I <br />think its part of the requirement that they go out also on public hearing, or had they gone <br />through public hearing process already? <br />YUEN:Well, they have to take public testimony at all their meetings. Theres a <br />public hearing where if three Council Members ask for a public hearing then they go to a <br />special public hearing. <br />DOMINGO:You know, this Commission has been taking up this issue for the past two <br />meetings, and the response and the attendance at the meetings have been very sparse. And its <br />toobadthatwefindthisbecause--thenagainhereImsayingthatthisisreflectiveofthe <br />concerns of the public -- when we have it for public scrutiny and input, we hardly have many of <br />them come here and respond to it. So what Im saying is that, you know, lets take a vote on 318 <br />and the rest we just send them up with no action on it, but with the explanation that youve made; <br />and lets incorporate that as part of a package to them. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you, Commissioner Domingo. Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:You know, I actually favor the Councils version of this bill, nothing <br />personal, Chris. But if we were to take the vote on the amended bill first, you know, then I <br />would be voting against it because Id want a chance to vote on the Council bill. On the other <br />hand, if we voted on the Council bill first, then Im having, Im having trouble articulating this, <br />is what Im having trouble with. I guess I would really like maybe just an informal straw poll to <br />see who prefers which bills and who prefers the other before -. <br />GRAHAM:I understand your concern being a procedural one, youd like to -. <br />SIRACUSA:Yeah, because I wouldnt want to vote against this and make it look like <br />Im not interested in the issues that the bill raises, because I very much am. Its just a question of <br />the fine tuning between one and the other one, you know. That would make the difference in my <br />preference. <br />GRAHAM:Commissioner Woodward, you have a thought? <br />WOODWARD:It might be cleaner if we just vote on the original bill; and my guess is it <br />will be voted down and then youre option would be clear. So if I might suggest we take a vote <br />on the original Council version of 318 and then follow that, assuming its defeated, with a bill on <br />the amended version. <br />GRAHAM:Mr. Torigoe, would that be reasonable for me to do, to ask the person who <br />made the motion to temporarily withdraw the motion, and then we take another motion, or just to <br />give it up and start over again with it after weve done the original Council one? <br />10EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.