My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-03-16 TBILLS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-03-16 TBILLS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:59:52 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:59:49 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GRAHAM:Allright,seconded by Commissioner Domingo. And we have discussion. <br />Mr. Woodward, no? <br />WOODWARD:No. <br />GRAHAM:Ms. Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA:On page 4, at the very top it says Controls on further subdivision or <br />rezoning will not help the situation because almost all development is occurring on existing lots. <br />And Im having trouble with that one because every lot is existing, you know. And when people <br />come in for rezoning, its to make a lot, usually make a lot smaller. And certainly subdivision is <br />to make more lots. So I dont understand, maybe Im missing something here in the thought <br />processes of the Director, and I would like him to clarify that for me. <br />YUEN:Well, its really a question of scale. And if you were to look, lets take the <br />Highway 130 between Keaau and Pahoa. Theres something like 20,000 existing lots there, and <br />there is a potential for more lots to be created. Most of the lots actually that have been created <br />by new subdivisions in the area, almost all of them are Hawaiian Homes and, again, are basically <br />outside the Countys land use authority to try to control that. Aside from Hawaiian Homes you <br />haveaverysmallnumberofnewlotsthatarecreatedbynewsubdivisions.Andyoucouldgo <br />back, you know, 10 years and you might have a single digit percentage increase in the number of <br />lots from new subdivisions. So to pass a bill thats trying to control additional subdivisions so <br />that you have 20,000 lots instead of 20,400 lots I think is not really productive. Its just not, it <br />doesnt significantly change the situation. Its not that you throw up your hands, but youre not <br />going to make a significant improvement by refusing subdivision of existing lots. On the other <br />hand, what youre doing is youre preventing somebody from, and Im talking about here the <br />traffic aspects of it. Im not talking about the location where it might be a bad place to have a <br />subdivision. You know, those site specific issues still have to be dealt with. But thats the basic <br />point here, is that the growth and population that takes place on the existing lots is so large that <br />to work on or even to greatly worry about the growth aspects of having subdivisions of existing <br />lots is, you know, its focusing on the wrong problem. <br />SIRACUSA:I could see your point if you were looking at it over a very large <br />geographical area, however, and when youre talking about a difference between 25,000 lots and <br />25,400, for example. But when you get down into an area, say, of a small subdivision, even a <br />small subdivision can make a tremendous difference. Youll recall that Ive recently written you <br />a letter about a whole series of subdivision proposals coming for Kaohe Homesteads and how if <br />that process is allowed to continue theres a potential for a density increase of 388% in a very <br />small area. And so thats really foremost in my head when Im reading this stuff, is relating it to <br />my own community. <br />YUEN:Well, there is a valid issue and the issue is this, under the current <br />Subdivision Code, if you have the zoning, as long as youre on a County road, you have no <br />further road requirement. The County can make you do some improvements on the frontage of <br />the road; but under the current Subdivision Code there isnt the power to make people do off-site <br />road requirements for the County road. <br />6EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.