Laserfiche WebLink
GRAHAM:Allright,seconded by Commissioner Domingo. And we have discussion. <br />Mr. Woodward, no? <br />WOODWARD:No. <br />GRAHAM:Ms. Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA:On page 4, at the very top it says Controls on further subdivision or <br />rezoning will not help the situation because almost all development is occurring on existing lots. <br />And I€m having trouble with that one because every lot is existing, you know. And when people <br />come in for rezoning, it€s to make a lot, usually make a lot smaller. And certainly subdivision is <br />to make more lots. So I don€t understand, maybe I€m missing something here in the thought <br />processes of the Director, and I would like him to clarify that for me. <br />YUEN:Well, it€s really a question of scale. And if you were to look, let€s take the <br />Highway 130 between Keaau and Pahoa. There€s something like 20,000 existing lots there, and <br />there is a potential for more lots to be created. Most of the lots actually that have been created <br />by new subdivisions in the area, almost all of them are Hawaiian Homes and, again, are basically <br />outside the County€s land use authority to try to control that. Aside from Hawaiian Homes you <br />haveaverysmallnumberofnewlotsthatarecreatedbynewsubdivisions.Andyoucouldgo <br />back, you know, 10 years and you might have a single digit percentage increase in the number of <br />lots from new subdivisions. So to pass a bill that€s trying to control additional subdivisions so <br />that you have 20,000 lots instead of 20,400 lots I think is not really productive. It€s just not, it <br />doesn€t significantly change the situation. It€s not that you throw up your hands, but you€re not <br />going to make a significant improvement by refusing subdivision of existing lots. On the other <br />hand, what you€re doing is you€re preventing somebody from, and I€m talking about here the <br />traffic aspects of it. I€m not talking about the location where it might be a bad place to have a <br />subdivision. You know, those site specific issues still have to be dealt with. But that€s the basic <br />point here, is that the growth and population that takes place on the existing lots is so large that <br />to work on or even to greatly worry about the growth aspects of having subdivisions of existing <br />lots is, you know, it€s focusing on the wrong problem. <br />SIRACUSA:I could see your point if you were looking at it over a very large <br />geographical area, however, and when you€re talking about a difference between 25,000 lots and <br />25,400, for example. But when you get down into an area, say, of a small subdivision, even a <br />small subdivision can make a tremendous difference. You€ll recall that I€ve recently written you <br />a letter about a whole series of subdivision proposals coming for Kaohe Homesteads and how if <br />that process is allowed to continue there€s a potential for a density increase of 388% in a very <br />small area. And so that€s really foremost in my head when I€m reading this stuff, is relating it to <br />my own community. <br />YUEN:Well, there is a valid issue and the issue is this, under the current <br />Subdivision Code, if you have the zoning, as long as you€re on a County road, you have no <br />further road requirement. The County can make you do some improvements on the frontage of <br />the road; but under the current Subdivision Code there isn€t the power to make people do off-site <br />road requirements for the County road. <br />6EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />